Department of Family and Community Medicine, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States; Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, United States; Departments of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States.
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Jan;63:295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) is highly prevalent and associated with a wide variety of negative mental and physical health outcomes. School-based CSA education and prevention programs have shown promise, but it is unclear to what extent community-level characteristics are related to their effectiveness. The present cluster randomized controlled trial evaluated community-level moderators of the Safe@Lastprogramcomparedtoawaitlistcontrolcondition.(*) Knowledge gains from pre- to post-intervention were assessed in 5 domains: safe versus unsafe people; safe choices; problem-solving; clear disclosure; and assertiveness. Participants were 1177 students (46% White, 26% African American, 15% Hispanic, 4% Asian American, 6% Other) in grades 1 through 6 from 14 public schools in Tennessee. Multilevel models accounting for the nesting of children within schools revealed large effect sizes for the intervention versus control across all knowledge domains (d's ranged from 1.56 to 2.13). The effectiveness of the program was moderated by mean per capita income and rates of substantiated cases of child abuse and neglect in the community. Intervention effects were stronger for youth living in lower as compared to higher income counties, and for youth attending schools in counties with lower as compared to higher abuse/neglect rates. Child characteristics (sex, race) did not moderate intervention effects. This research identified two community-level factors that predicted the effectiveness of a CSA education and prevention program designed to improve children's knowledge of personal safety skills. School-based CSA prevention programs may require modification for communities with higher rates of child abuse and neglect.
儿童期性虐待(CSA)非常普遍,与各种负面的身心健康后果相关。基于学校的 CSA 教育和预防计划已显示出希望,但尚不清楚社区层面的特征与这些计划的有效性有多大关系。本群随机对照试验评估了 Safe@Last 计划的社区层面调节因素,与等待名单对照条件相比。(*) 在 5 个领域评估了从干预前到干预后的知识增长:安全与不安全的人;安全选择;解决问题;明确披露;和自信。参与者是来自田纳西州 14 所公立学校的 1177 名 1 至 6 年级学生(46%为白人,26%为非裔美国人,15%为西班牙裔,4%为亚裔美国人,6%为其他族裔)。考虑到孩子在学校内的嵌套性的多层次模型显示,干预组与对照组在所有知识领域的效果都很大(d 值范围从 1.56 到 2.13)。该计划的有效性受到社区内人均收入和儿童虐待和忽视案件数量的调节。与生活在高收入县的年轻人相比,生活在低收入县的年轻人的干预效果更强,与在虐待/忽视率较高的县相比,生活在虐待/忽视率较低的县的年轻人的干预效果更强。儿童特征(性别、种族)并没有调节干预效果。这项研究确定了两个社区层面的因素,它们预测了旨在提高儿童个人安全技能知识的 CSA 教育和预防计划的有效性。对于儿童虐待和忽视率较高的社区,基于学校的 CSA 预防计划可能需要进行修改。