Fogliata Antonella, Cozzi Luca
Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan-Rozzano, Italy.
Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Dept, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan-Rozzano, Italy; Humanitas University, Biomedical Science Faculty, via Manzoni 118, 20089 Milan-Rozzano, Italy.
Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.104. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
This review addresses the theme of dose calculation accuracy in the case of the stereotactic treatment of lung lesions. Based on the classical categories of type "a", "b" and "c" algorithms (according to their degree of complexity in the management of charged particle transport), a summary of findings from literature is reported. Two main critical areas have been identified: the use of small fields and the presence of low density medium. Concerning the latter point, the algorithm accuracy is intrinsic of the algorithm core, and, notwithstanding the materials discretization and their chemical composition knowledge, type "c" are, at the most, able to reproduce the actual physical dose distribution in heterogeneous media. For what concerns the small field management, the final accuracy could be strongly related to the beam configuration appropriateness in the TPS (as well for MC this relates to the proper linac head description). As a very crude summary, type "a" should be considered as unsuitable for this kind of treatment calculations (with differences of the order of 20-30%), while type "b" and "c" could keep their accuracy approximatively within 10 and 5%, respectively.
本综述探讨了肺部病变立体定向治疗中剂量计算准确性的主题。基于“a”、“b”和“c”型算法的经典分类(根据其在带电粒子传输管理中的复杂程度),报告了文献研究结果的总结。已确定两个主要关键领域:小射野的使用和低密度介质的存在。关于后一点,算法准确性是算法核心所固有的,并且,尽管有材料离散化及其化学成分知识,“c”型算法最多只能在非均匀介质中重现实际物理剂量分布。对于小射野管理而言,最终准确性可能与TPS中射束配置的适宜性密切相关(对于蒙特卡罗方法而言,这也涉及对头加速器的正确描述)。作为一个非常粗略的总结,“a”型算法应被视为不适用于此类治疗计算(差异约为20 - 30%),而“b”型和“c”型算法的准确性分别可大致保持在10%和5%以内。