• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种剂量计算算法用于原位非小细胞肺癌放射治疗的剂量学准确性。

Dosimetric accuracy of three dose calculation algorithms for radiation therapy of in situ non-small cell lung carcinoma.

作者信息

Kolacio Manda Švabić, Rajlić David, Radojčić Milan, Radojčić Đeni Smilović, Obajdin Nevena, Debeljuh Dea Dundara, Jurković Slaven

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.

Clinic for Radiotherapy and Oncology, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 Mar 22;27(1):86-96. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0013. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0013
PMID:35402037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8989458/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Study determines differences in calculated dose distributions for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSC LC) patients. NSC LC cases were investigated, being the most common lung cancer treated by radiotherapy in our clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 15 NSCLC patient dose distributions originally calculated using standard superposition (SS) and recalculated using collapsed cone (CC ) and Monte Carlo (MC) based algorithm expressed as dose to medium in medium (MCD) and dose to water in medium (MCD) was performed so that prescribed dose covers at least 99% of the gross target volume (GTV). Statistical analysis was performed for differences of conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), dose delivered to 2% of the volume (D), mean dose (D) and percentage of volumes covered by prescribed dose (V). For organs at risk (OARs), D and percentage of volume receiving 20 Gy and 5Gy (V, V) were analysed.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference for GTVs was observed between MCD and SS algorithm in mean dose only. For planning target volumes (PTVs), statistically significant differences were observed in prescribed dose coverage for CC, MCD and MCD. The differences in mean CI value for the CC algorithm and mean HI value for MCD and MCD were statistically significant. There is a statistically significant difference in the number of MUs for MCD and MCD compared to SS.

CONCLUSION

All investigated algorithms succeed in managing the restrictive conditions of the clinical goals. This study shows the drawbacks of the CC algorithm compared to other algorithms used.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者计算剂量分布的差异。NSCLC病例是我们临床实践中接受放疗的最常见肺癌类型,对其进行了调查。

材料与方法

对15例NSCLC患者的剂量分布进行回顾性研究,最初使用标准叠加(SS)算法进行计算,然后使用基于坍缩圆锥(CC)和蒙特卡罗(MC)的算法重新计算,结果以介质中剂量(MCD)和介质中水剂量(MCD)表示,以使处方剂量覆盖至少99%的大体靶体积(GTV)。对适形指数(CI)、异质性指数(HI)、梯度指数(GI)、2%体积所接受的剂量(D)、平均剂量(D)以及处方剂量覆盖的体积百分比(V)的差异进行统计分析。对于危及器官(OARs),分析了D以及接受20 Gy和五Gy的体积百分比(V、V)。

结果

仅在平均剂量方面,观察到MCD与SS算法在GTVs之间存在统计学显著差异。对于计划靶体积(PTV),在CC、MCD和MCD的处方剂量覆盖方面观察到统计学显著差异。CC算法的平均CI值以及MCD和MCD的平均HI值的差异具有统计学显著性。与SS相比,MCD和MCD的监测单元数量存在统计学显著差异。

结论

所有研究算法均成功实现了临床目标的限制性条件。本研究显示了CC算法与其他所用算法相比的缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/6bb56d95586b/rpor-27-1-86f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/d01124e4680a/rpor-27-1-86f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/9bd35c51b812/rpor-27-1-86f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/9fd2834c1335/rpor-27-1-86f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/132e4e726a02/rpor-27-1-86f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/6bb56d95586b/rpor-27-1-86f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/d01124e4680a/rpor-27-1-86f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/9bd35c51b812/rpor-27-1-86f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/9fd2834c1335/rpor-27-1-86f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/132e4e726a02/rpor-27-1-86f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2087/8989458/6bb56d95586b/rpor-27-1-86f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Dosimetric accuracy of three dose calculation algorithms for radiation therapy of in situ non-small cell lung carcinoma.三种剂量计算算法用于原位非小细胞肺癌放射治疗的剂量学准确性。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 Mar 22;27(1):86-96. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0013. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.评估蒙特卡罗算法在接受立体定向体部放射治疗的周围型肺癌患者中符合 RTOG 0915 剂量学标准的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 8;17(3):277-293. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6077.
3
Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.肺部调强放射治疗患者剂量计算的准确性:蒙特卡罗法、卷积/叠加法和笔形束算法的比较
Med Phys. 2006 Sep;33(9):3149-58. doi: 10.1118/1.2241992.
4
On the use of a convolution-superposition algorithm for plan checking in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.利用卷积叠加算法进行肺部立体定向体放射治疗计划检查。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 8;17(5):99-110. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6186.
5
Dosimetric verification using monte carlo calculations for tissue heterogeneity-corrected conformal treatment plans following RTOG 0813 dosimetric criteria for lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy.使用蒙特卡罗计算对肺癌立体定向体部放射治疗 RTOG 0813 剂量学标准下组织不均匀性校正的适形治疗计划进行剂量验证。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):508-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
6
Stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary lesions: comparison of different dose calculation algorithms for Oncentra MasterPlan®.肺内病变的立体定向放射治疗:Oncentra MasterPlan® 不同剂量计算算法的比较
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Feb 22;10:51. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0354-3.
7
Dosimetric differences between local failure and local controlled non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: A matched-pair study.立体定向体部放疗治疗局部复发与局部控制的非小细胞肺癌患者的剂量学差异:一项配对研究。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jun;62(3):420-424. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12706. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
8
Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions.三代剂量计算算法在肺部 SBRT 中的性能:与基于全蒙特卡罗剂量分布的比较。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 6;15(2):4662. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4662.
9
A clinical study of lung cancer dose calculation accuracy with Monte Carlo simulation.一项使用蒙特卡罗模拟进行肺癌剂量计算准确性的临床研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Dec 16;9:287. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0287-2.
10
Comparative study of the collapsed cone convolution and Monte Carlo algorithms for radiation therapy planning of canine sinonasal tumors reveals significant dosimetric differences.犬鼻窦肿瘤放射治疗计划中坍塌锥卷积和蒙特卡罗算法的比较研究显示出显著的剂量学差异。
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2022 Jan;63(1):91-101. doi: 10.1111/vru.13039. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Dose Calculation Comparisons between Three Modern Treatment Planning Systems.三种现代治疗计划系统之间的剂量计算比较
J Med Phys. 2020 Jul-Sep;45(3):143-147. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_111_19. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
2
On the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systems.关于放射治疗计划系统中骨剂量到水剂量的转换
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Feb 9;5:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.01.004. eCollection 2018 Jan.
3
Experimental validation of Monte Carlo based treatment planning system in bone density equivalent media.
基于蒙特卡罗的骨密度等效介质治疗计划系统的实验验证。
Radiol Oncol. 2020 Sep 16;54(4):495-504. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0051.
4
Evaluation of the target dose coverage of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer using helical tomotherapy: A dynamic phantom study.使用螺旋断层放疗评估立体定向体部放疗对肺癌的靶区剂量覆盖:一项动态体模研究。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Mar-Apr;25(2):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms in conformal lung radiotherapy.适形肺放疗中笔形束算法与蒙特卡罗算法的剂量学比较
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Sep;19(5):616-624. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12426. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
6
Comparison of calculated dose distributions reported as dose-to-water and dose-to-medium for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.鼻咽癌患者调强放射治疗中报告为水模剂量和介质剂量的计算剂量分布比较。
Med Dosim. 2018;43(4):363-369. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.11.008. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
7
About the non-consistency of PTV-based prescription in lung.关于基于计划靶区(PTV)的肺部处方的不一致性。
Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:177-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Dose calculation algorithm accuracy for small fields in non-homogeneous media: The lung SBRT case.非均匀介质中小射野的剂量计算算法准确性:肺部立体定向体部放疗病例
Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.104. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Accuracy of dose calculation algorithms for static and rotational IMRT of lung cancer: A phantom study.肺癌静态和旋转调强放射治疗剂量计算算法的准确性:一项模体研究。
Phys Med. 2015 Jun;31(4):382-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Reinforcing of QA/QC programs in radiotherapy departments in Croatia: results of treatment planning system verification.克罗地亚放射治疗科质量保证/质量控制计划的强化:治疗计划系统验证结果
Med Dosim. 2013 Spring;38(1):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Dec 13.