• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测大龄男童阑尾炎的临床评分

A Clinical Score to Predict Appendicitis in Older Male Children.

作者信息

Kharbanda Anupam B, Monuteaux Michael C, Bachur Richard G, Dudley Nanette C, Bajaj Lalit, Stevenson Michelle D, Macias Charles G, Mittal Manoj K, Bennett Jonathan E, Sinclair Kelly, Dayan Peter S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics Emergency Medicine, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

Acad Pediatr. 2017 Apr;17(3):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2016.11.014
PMID:27890780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5562406/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a clinical score to predict appendicitis among older, male children who present to the emergency department with suspected appendicitis.

METHODS

Patients with suspected appendicitis were prospectively enrolled at 9 pediatric emergency departments. A total of 2625 patients enrolled; a subset of 961 male patients, age 8-18 were analyzed in this secondary analysis. Outcomes were determined using pathology, operative reports, and follow-up calls. Clinical and laboratory predictors with <10% missing data and kappa > 0.4 were entered into a multivariable model. Resultant β-coefficients were used to develop a clinical score. Test performance was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios.

RESULTS

The mean age was 12.2 years; 49.9% (480) had appendicitis, 22.3% (107) had perforation, and the negative appendectomy rate was 3%. In patients with and without appendicitis, overall imaging rates were 68.6% (329) and 84.4% (406), respectively. Variables retained in the model included maximum tenderness in the right lower quadrant, pain with walking/coughing or hopping, and the absolute neutrophil count. A score ≥8.1 had a sensitivity of 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20%-29%), specificity of 98% (95% CI, 96%-99%), and positive predictive value of 93% (95% CI, 86%-97%) for ruling in appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an accurate scoring system for predicting appendicitis in older boys. If validated, the score might allow clinicians to manage a proportion of male patients without diagnostic imaging.

摘要

目的

制定一种临床评分系统,用于预测因疑似阑尾炎就诊于急诊科的大龄男性儿童是否患有阑尾炎。

方法

在9家儿科急诊科对疑似阑尾炎患者进行前瞻性招募。共招募了2625例患者;在本次二次分析中,对961例年龄在8至18岁的男性患者亚组进行了分析。通过病理学、手术报告和随访电话确定结果。将缺失数据<10%且kappa>0.4的临床和实验室预测指标纳入多变量模型。使用所得的β系数制定临床评分。通过计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和似然比来评估测试性能。

结果

平均年龄为12.2岁;49.9%(480例)患有阑尾炎,22.3%(107例)发生穿孔,阴性阑尾切除率为3%。患有和未患有阑尾炎的患者,总体影像学检查率分别为68.6%(329例)和84.4%(406例)。模型中保留的变量包括右下腹最大压痛、行走/咳嗽或跳跃时疼痛以及绝对中性粒细胞计数。评分≥8.1时,诊断阑尾炎的敏感性为25%(95%置信区间[CI],20%-29%),特异性为98%(95%CI,96%-99%),阳性预测值为93%(95%CI,86%-97%)。

结论

我们开发了一种准确的评分系统,用于预测大龄男孩是否患有阑尾炎。如果得到验证,该评分可能使临床医生在部分男性患者中无需进行诊断性影像学检查即可进行处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a9f/5562406/595a245b59a5/nihms832258f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a9f/5562406/6a13c1cb18e2/nihms832258f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a9f/5562406/595a245b59a5/nihms832258f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a9f/5562406/6a13c1cb18e2/nihms832258f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a9f/5562406/595a245b59a5/nihms832258f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A Clinical Score to Predict Appendicitis in Older Male Children.预测大龄男童阑尾炎的临床评分
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Apr;17(3):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
2
Prospective validation of the pediatric appendicitis score in a Canadian pediatric emergency department.加拿大儿科急诊科小儿阑尾炎评分的前瞻性验证
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;16(7):591-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00445.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
3
A clinical decision rule to identify children at low risk for appendicitis.一项用于识别阑尾炎低风险儿童的临床决策规则。
Pediatrics. 2005 Sep;116(3):709-16. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0094.
4
Diagnostic characteristics of S100A8/A9 in a multicenter study of patients with acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain.多中心研究中急性右下腹痛患者 S100A8/A9 的诊断特征。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01259.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
5
A new 2-step risk-stratification clinical score for suspected appendicitis in children.一种针对儿童疑似阑尾炎的新的两步风险分层临床评分。
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Dec;50(12):2051-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.08.028. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
6
Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort.使用前瞻性儿科队列评估阑尾炎评分系统。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):778-84, 784.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.12.016. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
7
The use of white blood cell count and left shift in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.白细胞计数及核左移在儿童阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007 Feb;23(2):69-76. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31802d1716.
8
Validation and refinement of a prediction rule to identify children at low risk for acute appendicitis.验证和完善用于识别急性阑尾炎低风险儿童的预测规则。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Aug;166(8):738-44. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.490.
9
Which children could benefit from additional diagnostic tools in case of suspected appendicitis?对于疑似阑尾炎的情况,哪些儿童可以从额外的诊断工具中受益?
J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Apr;39(4):570-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.12.015.
10
Evaluation of scoring systems in predicting acute appendicitis in children.评估评分系统在预测儿童急性阑尾炎中的作用。
Surgery. 2016 Dec;160(6):1599-1604. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy Evaluation of Pediatric Appendicitis Scoring (PAS) Method in Differentiating Nonspecific Abdominal Pain from Appendicitis.小儿阑尾炎评分(PAS)方法在鉴别非特异性腹痛与阑尾炎中的准确性评估
Int J Prev Med. 2023 Mar 21;14:40. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_539_21. eCollection 2023.
2
Many diagnostic tools for appendicitis: a scoping review.许多用于阑尾炎诊断的工具:范围综述。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3419-3429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09890-2. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
3
Comparison of Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) and Lintula scoring systems in diagnosing acute appendicitis among children.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of Electronic Clinical Decision Support for Pediatric Appendicitis.小儿阑尾炎电子临床决策支持系统的实施
Pediatrics. 2016 May;137(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1745. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
2
Computed Tomography and Shifts to Alternate Imaging Modalities in Hospitalized Children.计算机断层扫描与住院儿童的替代成像方式转变。
Pediatrics. 2015 Sep;136(3):e573-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0995.
3
Campaigns Against Ionizing Radiation and Changed Practice Patterns for Imaging Use in Pediatric Appendicitis.小儿阑尾炎电离辐射防治运动与影像检查实践模式的改变
比较阑尾炎症反应(AIR)和林图拉评分系统在儿童急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
J Med Life. 2022 Apr;15(4):443-447. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0049.
4
Comparison of the appendicitis inflammatory response and Alvarado scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children.比较儿童急性阑尾炎的炎症反应和 Alvarado 评分系统在诊断中的应用。
J Med Life. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):75-80. doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0031.
5
The Jumping Up (J-Up) Test: Making the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Easier in Children.跳起(J-Up)试验:使儿童急性阑尾炎的诊断更容易
Glob Pediatr Health. 2019 Nov 11;6:2333794X19884824. doi: 10.1177/2333794X19884824. eCollection 2019.
6
Ruling out Appendicitis in Children: Can We Use Clinical Prediction Rules?排除儿童阑尾炎:我们能否使用临床预测规则?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):2027-2048. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3997-1. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Retrospective Multivariate Analysis of Data from Children with Suspected Appendicitis: A New Tool for Diagnosis.疑似阑尾炎患儿数据的回顾性多变量分析:一种新的诊断工具
Emerg Med Int. 2018 Sep 12;2018:4810730. doi: 10.1155/2018/4810730. eCollection 2018.
8
Development and Validation of a Novel Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC).开发和验证一种新的儿科阑尾炎风险计算器(pARC)。
Pediatrics. 2018 Apr;141(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2699. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
9
Which One is Better? Comparison of the Acute Inflammatory Response, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and Alvarado Scoring Systems.哪一个更好?急性炎症反应、拉贾·伊斯特里·彭吉兰·阿娜克·萨利哈阑尾炎评分系统与阿尔瓦拉多评分系统的比较
Ann Coloproctol. 2017 Dec;33(6):227-231. doi: 10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.227. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):720-1. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0912.
4
What are the most clinically useful cutoffs for the Alvarado and Pediatric Appendicitis Scores? A systematic review.阿尔瓦拉多评分和小儿阑尾炎评分最具临床实用性的临界值是多少?一项系统评价。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;64(4):365-372.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.02.025. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
5
Prospective evaluation of a clinical pathway for suspected appendicitis.前瞻性评估疑似阑尾炎的临床路径。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):e88-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2208. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
6
Evaluation of a novel pediatric appendicitis pathway using high- and low-risk scoring systems.使用高风险和低风险评分系统对一种新型小儿阑尾炎诊疗路径进行评估。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Oct;29(10):1060-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182a5c9b6.
7
Poor sensitivity of a modified Alvarado score in adults with suspected appendicitis.改良的阿尔瓦拉多评分在疑似阑尾炎成人患者中的敏感性欠佳。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;62(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.021. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
8
Does this child have appendicitis? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules for children with acute abdominal pain.这个孩子是否患有阑尾炎?对儿童急性腹痛的临床预测规则的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jan;66(1):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.004.
9
Computed tomography use among children presenting to emergency departments with abdominal pain.计算机断层扫描在因腹痛就诊于急诊科的儿童中的应用。
Pediatrics. 2012 Nov;130(5):e1069-75. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0739. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
10
Validation and refinement of a prediction rule to identify children at low risk for acute appendicitis.验证和完善用于识别急性阑尾炎低风险儿童的预测规则。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Aug;166(8):738-44. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.490.