Freeman Lynn, Gera Geetanjali, Horak Fay B, Blackinton Mary T, Besch Mark, King Laurie
Aegis Therapies, Plano, Texas.
PATH Clinical Research Institute, USA.
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2018 Apr/Jun;41(2):77-84. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000110.
Abnormal postural sway is associated with an increase in risk of falls but is difficult for clinicians to accurately quantify without access to laboratory equipment. Instrumenting clinical outcome measures using body-worn movement monitors is a low-cost alternative. This is the first study to compare the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration for Balance (i-mCTSIB) to the laboratory test of the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) with dynamic posturography in a group of participants with Parkinson's disease (PD) and subtle balance limitations. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the concurrent validity of the i-mCTSIB with the SOT (6 and 4 conditions) and (2) compare the i-mCTSIB and the SOT to differentiate between individuals with and without recent falls within the previous 6 months.
This cross-sectional study examined 26 participants with idiopathic PD who had a Motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score of 32.7 (13.5) out of 108.
The composite and conditions 1 and 4 of the i-mCTSIB and SOT scores were significantly correlated: composite scores r = -0.64 (P ≤ .001), C1 r = -0.43 (P = .03), C3 r = -0.60 (P ≤ .01), and C4 r = -0.54 (P ≤ .001). A significant difference was observed in mean i-mCTSIB composite scores between fallers and nonfallers (P = .04). In contrast, the SOT composite was not significantly different between fallers and nonfallers (P = 0.31).
The results suggest that the i-mCTSIB may be a valid and clinically meaningful measure of sensory organization in persons with PD, even those with mild postural instability as measured by the median Hoehn and Yahr score (2.0). Future research should evaluate predictive validity of the i-mCTSIB for prospective falls.
The instrumented mCTSIB with portable, body-worn movement allows clinicians to quantify abnormal postural sway without the ceiling effects of clinical balance testing or the expense and importability of force plate technology in the SOT. Instrumenting mCTSIB may also distinguish between fallers and nonfallers.
异常姿势摆动与跌倒风险增加相关,但临床医生若无法使用实验室设备,则难以准确量化。使用穿戴式运动监测器来测量临床结局指标是一种低成本的替代方法。本研究首次在一组患有帕金森病(PD)且存在轻微平衡障碍的参与者中,将改良的平衡感觉统合临床测试(i-mCTSIB)与采用动态姿势描记法的感觉统合测试(SOT)实验室测试进行比较。本研究的目的是:(1)确定i-mCTSIB与SOT(6种和4种条件)的同时效度;(2)比较i-mCTSIB和SOT,以区分在过去6个月内有跌倒和无跌倒的个体。
这项横断面研究纳入了26例特发性PD患者,其帕金森病运动统一评分量表得分为32.7(13.5)(满分108分)。
i-mCTSIB和SOT评分的综合得分以及条件1和条件4得分显著相关:综合得分r = -0.64(P≤.001),C1得分r = -0.43(P =.03),C3得分r = -0.60(P≤.01),C4得分r = -0.54(P≤.001)。在跌倒者和未跌倒者之间,i-mCTSIB综合平均得分存在显著差异(P =.04)。相比之下,跌倒者和未跌倒者之间的SOT综合得分无显著差异(P = 0.31)。
结果表明,i-mCTSIB可能是评估PD患者感觉统合的一种有效且具有临床意义的指标,即使是那些根据Hoehn和Yahr中位数评分(2.0)显示为轻度姿势不稳的患者。未来的研究应评估i-mCTSIB对未来跌倒的预测效度。
配备便携式穿戴式运动监测器的改良CTSIB使临床医生能够量化异常姿势摆动,而不会出现临床平衡测试的天花板效应,也无需承担SOT中测力板技术的费用和不可携带性问题。改良CTSIB还可能区分跌倒者和未跌倒者。