Patterson Scott B, Beckett Allison R, Lintner Alicia, Leahey Carly, Greer Ashley, Brevard Sidney B, Simmons Jon D, Kahn Steven A
From the Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile.
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e95-e100. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000471.
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) contain lithium batteries that have been known to explode and/or cause fires that have resulted in burn injury. The purpose of this article is to present a case study, review injuries caused by e-cigarettes, and present a novel classification system from the newly emerging patterns of burns. A case study was presented and online media reports for e-cigarette burns were queried with search terms "e-cigarette burns" and "electronic cigarette burns." The reports and injury patterns were tabulated. Analysis was then performed to create a novel classification system based on the distinct injury patterns seen in the study. Two patients were seen at our regional burn center after e-cigarette burns. One had an injury to his thigh and penis that required operative intervention after ignition of this device in his pocket. The second had a facial burn and corneal abrasions when the device exploded while he was inhaling vapor. The Internet search and case studies resulted in 26 cases for evaluation. The burn patterns were divided in direct injury from the device igniting and indirect injury when the device caused a house or car fire. A numerical classification was created: direct injury: type 1 (hand injury) 7 cases, type 2 (face injury) 8 cases, type 3 (waist/groin injury) 11 cases, and type 5a (inhalation injury from using device) 2 cases; indirect injury: type 4 (house fire injury) 7 cases and type 5b (inhalation injury from fire started by the device) 4 cases. Multiple e-cigarette injuries are occurring in the United States and distinct patterns of burns are emerging. The classification system developed in this article will aid in further study and future regulation of these dangerous devices.
电子烟含有锂电池,已知其会爆炸和/或引发火灾,进而导致烧伤。本文旨在呈现一个案例研究,回顾电子烟造成的伤害,并根据新出现的烧伤模式提出一种新颖的分类系统。本文呈现了一个案例研究,并通过搜索词“电子烟烧伤”和“电子香烟烧伤”查询了电子烟烧伤的在线媒体报道。将这些报道和损伤模式制成表格。然后进行分析,以基于研究中观察到的不同损伤模式创建一种新颖的分类系统。在我们地区烧伤中心,有两名患者在遭受电子烟烧伤后前来就诊。其中一名患者大腿和阴茎受伤,该装置在其口袋中起火后需要进行手术干预。另一名患者在吸入蒸汽时装置爆炸,导致面部烧伤和角膜擦伤。通过互联网搜索和案例研究,共得到26例可供评估的病例。烧伤模式分为装置点火造成的直接损伤和装置引发房屋或汽车火灾时的间接损伤。创建了一个数字分类:直接损伤:1型(手部损伤)7例,2型(面部损伤)8例,3型(腰部/腹股沟损伤)11例,5a型(使用装置时的吸入性损伤)2例;间接损伤:4型(房屋火灾损伤)7例,5b型(装置引发火灾导致的吸入性损伤)4例。在美国,电子烟造成的多种伤害正在发生,且不同的烧伤模式正在显现。本文开发的分类系统将有助于对这些危险装置进行进一步研究和未来监管。