Sekiba Kazuma, Ohmae Tomoya, Odawara Nariaki, Moriyama Makoto, Kanai Sachiko, Tsuboi Mayo, Saito Tomotaka, Uchino Koji, Akamatsu Masatoshi, Okamoto Makoto
Department of Gastroenterology, JR Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(47):e5449. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005449.
It is often difficult to insert a long intestinal tube (LT) in patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO). We developed a novel technique for inserting an LT without endoscopy called nonendoscopic over-the-wire method via short nasogastric tube (NEWSt). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of NEWSt.We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent LT insertion for SBO without any indications of strangulation with either NEWSt (n = 16) or endoscopy (n = 17) between November 2011 and February 2015 at our hospital. Univariate analysis was used to assess the success rate of LT placement beyond the duodenojejunal flexure, time required for the procedure, clinical outcomes, and adverse events.The success rate was 100% in both groups. Procedure time was numerically, but not statistically, shorter in the NEWSt group compared with the endoscopy group (24 ± 13 vs 30 ± 13 min; P = 0.174). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of surgery rate (31% vs 12%; P = 0.225), fasting period (11.3 ± 6.3 vs 9.9 ± 4.5 days; P = 0.482), hospital stay (26.4 ± 22.1 vs 18.7 ± 7.0 days; P = 0.194), and recurrence rate (19% vs 24%; P = 1.0). No serious adverse event was observed in the NEWSt group, whereas serious aspiration pneumonia was observed in 2 patients after LT insertion in the endoscopy group.Without endoscopy, NEWSt enabled the high success rate and the short procedure time for the LT insertion. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed.
在小肠梗阻(SBO)患者中,插入长肠管(LT)通常很困难。我们开发了一种无需内镜检查插入LT的新技术,即通过短鼻胃管的非内镜导丝法(NEWSt)。我们评估了NEWSt的有效性和安全性。我们对2011年11月至2015年2月在我院因SBO接受LT插入且无绞窄迹象的患者进行了回顾性研究,其中使用NEWSt的患者有16例,使用内镜检查的患者有17例。采用单因素分析评估LT放置至十二指肠空肠曲远端的成功率、手术所需时间、临床结局和不良事件。两组的成功率均为100%。NEWSt组的手术时间在数值上比内镜检查组短,但无统计学差异(24±13分钟 vs 30±13分钟;P = 0.174)。两组在手术率(31% vs 12%;P = 0.225)、禁食期(11.3±6.3天 vs 9.9±4.5天;P = 0.482)、住院时间(26.4±22.1天 vs 18.7±7.0天;P = 0.194)和复发率(19% vs 24%;P = 1.0)方面无统计学显著差异。NEWSt组未观察到严重不良事件,而内镜检查组有2例患者在LT插入后发生严重吸入性肺炎。无需内镜检查,NEWSt可实现LT插入的高成功率和较短手术时间。需要进行前瞻性随机对照试验。