Thurber Katherine Ann, Banwell Cathy, Neeman Teresa, Dobbins Timothy, Pescud Melanie, Lovett Raymond, Banks Emily
1National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health,Research School of Population Health,The Australian National University,62 Mills Road,Acton,ACT 2601,Australia.
2Statistical Consulting Unit,The Australian National University,Acton,ACT,Australia.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Apr;20(5):832-847. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003013. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
To identify barriers to fruit and vegetable intake for Indigenous Australian children and quantify factors related to these barriers, to help understand why children do not meet recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake.
We examined factors related to carer-reported barriers using multilevel Poisson models (robust variance); a key informant focus group guided our interpretation of findings.
Eleven diverse sites across Australia.
Australian Indigenous children and their carers (N 1230) participating in the Longitudinal Study of Indigenous Children.
Almost half (45 %; n 555/1230) of carers reported barriers to their children's fruit and vegetable intake. Dislike of fruit and vegetables was the most common barrier, reported by 32·9 % of carers; however, we identified few factors associated with dislike. Carers were more than ten times less likely to report barriers to accessing fruit and vegetables if they lived large cities v. very remote areas. Within urban and inner regional areas, child and carer well-being, financial security, suitable housing and community cohesion promoted access to fruit and vegetables.
In this national Indigenous Australian sample, almost half of carers faced barriers to providing their children with a healthy diet. Both remote/outer regional carers and disadvantaged urban/inner regional carers faced problems accessing fruit and vegetables for their children. Where vegetables were accessible, children's dislike was a substantial barrier. Nutrition promotion must address the broader family, community, environmental and cultural contexts that impact nutrition, and should draw on the strengths of Indigenous families and communities.
确定澳大利亚原住民儿童摄入水果和蔬菜的障碍,并量化与这些障碍相关的因素,以帮助理解儿童为何未达到水果和蔬菜摄入建议量。
我们使用多水平泊松模型(稳健方差)研究与照料者报告的障碍相关的因素;一个关键信息提供者焦点小组指导我们对研究结果的解读。
澳大利亚的11个不同地点。
参与原住民儿童纵向研究的澳大利亚原住民儿童及其照料者(N = 1230)。
近一半(45%;n = 555/1230)的照料者报告其子女摄入水果和蔬菜存在障碍。不喜欢水果和蔬菜是最常见的障碍,32.9%的照料者报告了这一情况;然而,我们发现与不喜欢相关的因素很少。与生活在偏远地区的照料者相比,如果生活在大城市,照料者报告获取水果和蔬菜存在障碍的可能性要低十多倍。在城市和内城区,儿童和照料者的幸福感、经济保障、合适的住房以及社区凝聚力促进了水果和蔬菜的获取。
在这个澳大利亚原住民全国样本中,近一半的照料者在为子女提供健康饮食方面面临障碍。偏远/外城区的照料者以及处于不利地位的城市/内城区的照料者在为子女获取水果和蔬菜方面都面临问题。在能够获取蔬菜的地方,儿童的不喜欢是一个重大障碍。营养促进必须解决影响营养的更广泛的家庭、社区、环境和文化背景问题,并且应该利用原住民家庭和社区的优势。