Jørgensen Thea Suldrup, Rasmussen Mette, Jørgensen Sanne Ellegaard, Ersbøll Annette Kjær, Pedersen Trine Pagh, Aarestrup Anne Kristine, Due Pernille, Krølner Rikke
Centre for Intervention Research in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2nd floor, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2nd floor, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Nov 14;5:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.009. eCollection 2017 Mar.
Knowledge of the association between implementation of different intervention components and the determinants they are tailored to change may contribute to evaluating the effects and working mechanisms of multi-component interventions. This study examined 1) the effect of a Danish multi-component school-based intervention (2010 - 2011) on key determinants of adolescents' fruit and vegetable intake and 2) if dose of curricular activities was positively associated with change in these determinants. Using multi-level linear and logistic regression analyses stratified by gender and socioeconomic position, we analyzed survey data from the cluster-randomized Boost study targeting Danish 13-year-olds' fruit and vegetable intake. We examined 1) differences in knowledge of recommendations, taste preferences and situational norms between students from 20 intervention ( 991) and 20 control ( 915) schools at follow-up; and 2) associations between curriculum dose received and delivered (student and teacher data aggregated to school- and class-level) and these determinants among students at intervention schools only. At follow-up, more students from intervention than control schools knew the recommendation for vegetable intake (OR 1.56, CI:1.18, 2.06) and number of fruits liked (taste preferences) increased by 0.22 (CI:0.04, 0.41). At class-level, curriculum dose received was positively associated with proportion of students knowing the recommendation for vegetable intake (OR 1.06, CI:1.002, 1.13). In stratified analyses, this association was only significant among students from high social class (OR 1.17, CI:1.04, 1.31). The Boost intervention succeeded in improving students' taste preferences for fruit and knowledge of recommendation for vegetable intake, but only the latter determinant was positively associated with curriculum dose. ISRCTN11666034.
了解不同干预成分的实施与它们旨在改变的决定因素之间的关联,可能有助于评估多成分干预措施的效果和作用机制。本研究考察了:1)丹麦一项基于学校的多成分干预措施(2010 - 2011年)对青少年水果和蔬菜摄入量关键决定因素的影响;2)课程活动剂量是否与这些决定因素 的变化呈正相关。我们使用按性别和社会经济地位分层的多层次线性和逻辑回归分析,分析了针对丹麦13岁青少年水果和蔬菜摄入量的整群随机“促进”研究中的调查数据。我们考察了:1)在随访时,来自20所干预学校(991名学生)和20所对照学校(915名学生)的学生在推荐知识、口味偏好和情境规范方面的差异;2)仅在干预学校的学生中,所接受和实施的课程剂量(学生和教师数据汇总到学校和班级层面)与这些决定因素之间的关联。在随访时,干预学校中知道蔬菜摄入量推荐的学生比对照学校更多(比值比1.56,置信区间:1.18, 2.06),喜欢的水果数量(口味偏好)增加了0.22(置信区间:0.04, 0.41)。在班级层面,所接受的课程剂量与知道蔬菜摄入量推荐的学生比例呈正相关(比值比1.06,置信区间:1.002, 1.13)。在分层分析中,这种关联仅在高社会阶层的学生中显著(比值比1.17,置信区间:1.04, 1.31)。“促进”干预措施成功改善了学生对水果的口味偏好和对蔬菜摄入量推荐的知识,但只有后一个决定因素与课程剂量呈正相关。国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN11666034。