Jørgensen Sanne Ellegård, Jørgensen Thea Suldrup, Aarestrup Anne Kristine, Due Pernille, Krølner Rikke
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2., 1353, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Council on Health and Disease Prevention, Kristianiagade 12, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 26;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0435-1.
Based on the assumption of parental influence on adolescent behavior, multicomponent school-based dietary interventions often include a parental component. The effect of this intervention component is seldom reported and the evidence is inconsistent. We conducted a systematic process evaluation of the parental component and examined whether the leveal of parental involvement in a large multi-component intervention: the Boost study was associated with adolescents' fruit and vegetable (FV) intake at follow-up.
The Boost study was targeting FV intake among 1,175 Danish 7 graders (≈13- year-olds) in the school year 2010/11. The study included a school component: free FV in class and curricular activities; a local community component: fact sheets for sports- and youth clubs; and a parental component: presentation of Boost at a parent-school meeting, 6 newsletters to parents, 3 guided student-parent curricular activities, and a student-parent Boost event.
Students whose parent replied to the follow-up survey (n = 347).
Questionnaire data from students, parents and teachers at 20 intervention schools. Process evaluation measures: dose delivered, dose received, appreciation and level of parental involvement. Parental involvement was trichotomized into: low/no (0-2 points), medium (3 points) and high (4-6 points). The association between level of parental involvement and self-reported FV intake (24-h recall), was analyzed using multilevel regression analyses.
The Boost study was presented at a parent-school meeting at all intervention schools. The dose delivered was low to moderate for the three other parental elements. Most parents appreciated the intervention and talked with their child about Boost (83.5 %). High, medium and low parental involvement was found among 30.5 %, 29.6 % and 39.4 % of the students respectively. Parental involvement was highest among women. More men agreed that the parental newsletters provided new information. Students with a medium and high level of parental involvement ate 47.5 and 95.2 g more FV per day compared to students with low level/no parental involvement (p = 0.02).
Students with a high level of parental involvement ate significantly more FV at follow-up compared to students with a low level/no parental involvement. Parental involvement in interventions may improve adolescents' FV intake if challenges of implementation can be overcome.
ISRCTN11666034 . Registered 06/01/2012. Retrospectively registered.
基于父母对青少年行为有影响这一假设,多成分的校内饮食干预措施通常包含针对父母的部分。这一干预部分的效果鲜有报道,且证据并不一致。我们对针对父母的部分进行了系统的过程评估,并研究在一项大型多成分干预措施(即“促进”研究)中,父母参与程度是否与随访时青少年的果蔬摄入量相关。
“促进”研究旨在提高2010/11学年1175名丹麦七年级学生(约13岁)的果蔬摄入量。该研究包括一个校内部分:课堂上提供免费果蔬及开展课程活动;一个当地社区部分:为体育和青少年俱乐部提供情况说明书;以及一个针对父母的部分:在家长-学校会议上介绍“促进”项目,向家长发送6份时事通讯,开展3次有指导的学生-家长课程活动,以及举办一次学生-家长“促进”活动。
父母回复了随访调查的学生(n = 347)。
来自20所干预学校的学生、家长和教师的问卷调查数据。过程评估指标:提供的剂量、接受的剂量、满意度以及父母参与程度。父母参与程度被分为三类:低/无(0 - 2分)、中等(3分)和高(4 - 6分)。使用多水平回归分析来分析父母参与程度与自我报告的果蔬摄入量(24小时回顾法)之间的关联。
所有干预学校都在家长-学校会议上介绍了“促进”研究。其他三个针对父母的项目提供的剂量为低到中等。大多数家长对该干预措施表示满意,并与孩子谈论了“促进”项目(83.5%)。分别有30.5%、29.6%和39.4%的学生家长参与程度高、中等和低/无。女性家长的参与程度最高。更多男性认为家长时事通讯提供了新信息。与家长参与程度低/无的学生相比,家长参与程度中等和高的学生每天多摄入47.5克和95.2克果蔬(p = 0.02)。
与家长参与程度低/无的学生相比,家长参与程度高的学生在随访时摄入的果蔬量显著更多。如果能够克服实施过程中的挑战,父母参与干预措施可能会提高青少年的果蔬摄入量。
ISRCTN11666034。2012年1月6日注册。回顾性注册。