• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土壤微生物群落缓冲三种硬木树种对干旱胁迫的生理响应。

Soil microbial communities buffer physiological responses to drought stress in three hardwood species.

作者信息

Kannenberg Steven A, Phillips Richard P

机构信息

Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47403, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2017 Mar;183(3):631-641. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3783-2. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00442-016-3783-2
PMID:27896478
Abstract

Trees possess myriad adaptations for coping with drought stress, but the extent to which their drought responses are influenced by interactions with soil microbes is poorly understood. To explore the role of microbes in mediating tree responses to drought stress, we exposed saplings of three species (Acer saccharum, Liriodendron tulipifera, and Quercus alba) to a four week experimental drought in mesocosms. Half of the pots were inoculated with a live soil slurry (i.e., a microbial inoculum derived from soils beneath the canopies of mature A. saccharum, L. tulipifera or Q. alba stands), while the other half of the pots received a sterile soil slurry. Soil microbes ameliorated drought stress in L. tulipifera by minimizing reductions in leaf water potential and by reducing photosynthetic declines. In A. saccharum, soil microbes reduced drought stress by lessening declines in leaf water potential, though these changes did not buffer the trees from declining photosynthetic rates. In Q. alba, soil microbes had no effects on leaf physiological parameters during drought stress. In all species, microbes had no significant effects on dynamic C allocation during drought stress, suggesting that microbial effects on plant physiology were unrelated to source-sink dynamics. Collectively, our results suggest that soil microbes have the potential to alter key parameters that are used to diagnose drought sensitivity (i.e., isohydry or anisohydry). To the extent that our results reflect dynamics occurring in forests, a revised perspective on plant hydraulic strategies that considers root-microbe interactions may lead to improved predictions of forest vulnerability to drought.

摘要

树木拥有无数应对干旱胁迫的适应性机制,但它们的干旱响应受与土壤微生物相互作用影响的程度却鲜为人知。为了探究微生物在介导树木对干旱胁迫响应中的作用,我们将三种树种(糖枫、北美鹅掌楸和白栎)的树苗置于中型生态箱中进行了为期四周的干旱实验。一半的花盆接种了活的土壤泥浆(即源自成熟糖枫、北美鹅掌楸或白栎林冠下土壤的微生物接种物),而另一半花盆则接种了无菌土壤泥浆。土壤微生物通过最大限度地减少叶片水势的降低和减少光合作用的下降,缓解了北美鹅掌楸的干旱胁迫。在糖枫中,土壤微生物通过减轻叶片水势的下降降低了干旱胁迫,尽管这些变化并未缓冲树木光合速率的下降。在白栎中,土壤微生物在干旱胁迫期间对叶片生理参数没有影响。在所有树种中,微生物在干旱胁迫期间对碳动态分配没有显著影响,这表明微生物对植物生理的影响与源 - 库动态无关。总体而言,我们的结果表明土壤微生物有可能改变用于诊断干旱敏感性的关键参数(即等水线或非等水线)。就我们的结果反映森林中发生的动态而言,一种考虑根 - 微生物相互作用修订后的植物水力策略观点可能会改善对森林干旱脆弱性的预测。

相似文献

1
Soil microbial communities buffer physiological responses to drought stress in three hardwood species.土壤微生物群落缓冲三种硬木树种对干旱胁迫的生理响应。
Oecologia. 2017 Mar;183(3):631-641. doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3783-2. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
2
Coarse roots prevent declines in whole-tree non-structural carbohydrate pools during drought in an isohydric and an anisohydric species.在等水力和非等水力物种中,粗根防止了干旱期间整树非结构性碳水化合物库的下降。
Tree Physiol. 2018 Apr 1;38(4):582-590. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx119.
3
Dynamics of stem water uptake among isohydric and anisohydric species experiencing a severe drought.在经历严重干旱的等水力和非等水力物种中,茎部水分吸收的动态。
Tree Physiol. 2017 Oct 1;37(10):1379-1392. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw126.
4
The xylem of anisohydric Quercus alba L. is more vulnerable to embolism than isohydric codominants.寡水型白栎的木质部比等水优势种更容易受到栓塞的影响。
Plant Cell Environ. 2022 Feb;45(2):329-346. doi: 10.1111/pce.14244. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
5
Drought and air warming affect the species-specific levels of stress-related foliar metabolites of three oak species on acidic and calcareous soil.干旱和空气变暖会影响三种栎属植物在酸性和石灰性土壤上与胁迫相关的叶内代谢物的种特异性水平。
Tree Physiol. 2013 May;33(5):489-504. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt025. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
6
Physiological and biochemical responses of Quercus pubescens to air warming and drought on acidic and calcareous soils.栓皮栎对酸性和钙质土壤增温和干旱的生理生化响应。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15 Suppl 1:157-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00627.x. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
7
Species assemblage patterns around a dominant emergent tree are associated with drought resistance.优势挺水树种周围的物种组合模式与抗旱性有关。
Tree Physiol. 2013 Dec;33(12):1269-83. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt095. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
8
Plant-microbial responses to reduced precipitation depend on tree species in a temperate forest.温带森林中植物-微生物对降水减少的响应因树种而异。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Oct;28(19):5820-5830. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16340. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
9
Water regime and growth of young oak stands subjected to air-warming and drought on two different forest soils in a model ecosystem experiment.水文学和在模型生态系统实验中两种不同森林土壤上的幼栎林受空气增温和干旱的影响的生长。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jan;15 Suppl 1:138-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00552.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
10
Drought enhances symbiotic dinitrogen fixation and competitive ability of a temperate forest tree.干旱增强了温带森林树木的共生固氮作用和竞争力。
Oecologia. 2014 Apr;174(4):1117-26. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2851-0. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling the secrets of soil microbiome and climate change for sustainable agroecosystems.揭示土壤微生物组的秘密以及应对气候变化以实现可持续农业生态系统
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2025 Feb;70(1):19-40. doi: 10.1007/s12223-024-01194-9. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
Effects of Soil Microbes on Functional Traits of Loblolly Pine () Seedling Families From Contrasting Climates.土壤微生物对来自不同气候条件的火炬松()幼苗家系功能性状的影响 。 需注意,原文括号处内容缺失,翻译只能按现有内容准确呈现。
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 9;10:1643. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01643. eCollection 2019.
3
Plant-microbe interactions before drought influence plant physiological responses to subsequent severe drought.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in drought response strategies with ontogeny in Quercus rubra: implications for scaling from seedlings to mature trees.红栎发育过程中干旱响应策略的变化:对从幼苗到成熟树木尺度转换的启示
Oecologia. 2000 Jul;124(1):8-18. doi: 10.1007/PL00008865.
2
How tree roots respond to drought.树木根系如何应对干旱。
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jul 29;6:547. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00547. eCollection 2015.
3
The role of isohydric and anisohydric species in determining ecosystem-scale response to severe drought.等水物种和非等水物种在决定生态系统尺度对严重干旱的响应中的作用。
植物-微生物相互作用在干旱前影响植物对随后严重干旱的生理响应。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36971-3.
Oecologia. 2015 Nov;179(3):641-54. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3380-9. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation.两种半干旱针叶树种对降水减少和气候变暖的响应揭示了气孔调节的新观点。
Plant Cell Environ. 2016 Jan;39(1):38-49. doi: 10.1111/pce.12588. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
5
Allocation dynamics of recently fixed carbon in beech saplings in response to increased temperatures and drought.山毛榉幼树中近期固定碳的分配动态对温度升高和干旱的响应
Tree Physiol. 2015 Jun;35(6):585-98. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv024. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes.重新定义细根可提高对地下贡献陆地生物圈过程的理解。
New Phytol. 2015 Aug;207(3):505-18. doi: 10.1111/nph.13363. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
7
The role of defoliation and root rot pathogen infection in driving the mode of drought-related physiological decline in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.).落叶和根腐病原菌感染在驱动苏格兰松(Pinus sylvestris L.)干旱相关生理衰退模式中的作用。
Tree Physiol. 2015 Mar;35(3):229-42. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv005. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Summer drought alters carbon allocation to roots and root respiration in mountain grassland.夏季干旱改变了山地草原根系的碳分配和根系呼吸。
New Phytol. 2015 Feb;205(3):1117-1127. doi: 10.1111/nph.13146. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
9
A new look at water transport regulation in plants.植物水分运输调节的新视角。
New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(1):105-115. doi: 10.1111/nph.12912. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
10
Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis.丛枝菌根共生在干旱条件下比在水分充足条件下对宿主植物气孔导度的影响更大:一项荟萃分析。
Mycorrhiza. 2015 Jan;25(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00572-014-0585-4. Epub 2014 May 16.