Çelik Onur, Eskiizmir Görkem, Uz Uzdan
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, Turkey.
J Int Adv Otol. 2016 Dec;12(3):277-281. doi: 10.5152/iao.2016.2397. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of auditory steady-state response (ASSR), determine the cut-off values for each frequency, and detect the best correlated frequencies when compared with the auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in term babies under the age of 12 months.
In total, 88 term babies with a mean age of 2.98 (1-11) months (174 ears) underwent ASSR and ABR tests. The ASSR thresholds for the frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were compared with the hearing level of the ABR thresholds. In the ABR test, a cut-off value of 30 dB nHL was selected for normal hearing. In addition, the best correlation between the ABR and ASSR thresholds and the estimated cut-off thresholds of ASSR for each of the abovementioned frequencies were obtained.
In total, 135 ears had values indicating normal hearing ability and 39 ears had hearing loss according to the ABR thresholds. Although statistically significant correlations were found between the ABR and ASSR thresholds at all frequencies in all groups, these correlations were not strong. On the other hand, a strong correlation was found between the responses of the ABR and ASSR thresholds at 4000 Hz in the hearing-impaired subjects.
Our findings suggest that ASSR may not be beneficial or reliable as a screening test. Thus, it is likely to be considered as a complementary test rather than an alternative to the ABR test.
本研究的目的是评估听觉稳态反应(ASSR)的有效性,确定每个频率的截止值,并在12个月以下的足月儿中,将其与听觉脑干反应(ABR)阈值进行比较时检测最佳相关频率。
共有88名平均年龄为2.98(1 - 11)个月的足月儿(174只耳)接受了ASSR和ABR测试。将500、1000、2000和4000Hz频率的ASSR阈值与ABR阈值的听力水平进行比较。在ABR测试中,选择30dB nHL的截止值作为正常听力标准。此外,还获得了ABR和ASSR阈值之间的最佳相关性以及上述每个频率ASSR的估计截止阈值。
根据ABR阈值,共有135只耳的值表明听力正常,39只耳存在听力损失。虽然在所有组的所有频率上ABR和ASSR阈值之间均发现有统计学意义的相关性,但这些相关性并不强。另一方面,在听力受损受试者中,发现ABR和ASSR阈值在4000Hz时的反应之间存在强相关性。
我们的研究结果表明,ASSR作为一种筛查测试可能并无益处或不可靠。因此,它可能被视为一种补充测试,而非ABR测试的替代方法。