• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液系统疾病患者长期留置中心静脉导管的并发症,特别关注感染问题。

Complications from long-term indwelling central venous catheters in hematologic patients with special reference to infection.

作者信息

Kappers-Klunne M C, Degener J E, Stijnen T, Abels J

机构信息

Department of Hematology, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancer. 1989 Oct 15;64(8):1747-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891015)64:8<1747::aid-cncr2820640832>3.0.co;2-f.

DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19891015)64:8<1747::aid-cncr2820640832>3.0.co;2-f
PMID:2790689
Abstract

Forty-three evaluable patients with hematologic malignancies, mainly acute leukemia, were prospectively randomized to receive a double lumen central venous catheter or a totally implantable venous access system. The mean catheter stay was 166 days (median, 104 days) for the 23 double lumen catheters and 164 days (median, 65 days) for implanted systems. Exit site infections were not encountered in double lumen catheters, but there were two proven infections around the injection port of implanted devices. Tunnel infections did not occur. Seven double lumen catheters and four implanted systems were removed because of infection. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the predominant microorganism cultured from these catheters. Five of nine patients with double lumen catheters and catheter-related S. epidermidis infection and the two patients with implanted systems in whom S. epidermidis was cultured were on selective gut decontamination. The pattern of infection did not seem to be influenced by this regimen. Totally implantable systems proved to be as safe as double lumen central venous lines.

摘要

43例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者(主要为急性白血病)被前瞻性随机分组,分别接受双腔中心静脉导管或完全植入式静脉通路系统。23根双腔导管的平均置管时间为166天(中位数为104天),植入式系统的平均置管时间为164天(中位数为65天)。双腔导管未发生出口部位感染,但植入装置注射端口周围有2例确诊感染。未发生隧道感染。7根双腔导管和4个植入式系统因感染被拔除。表皮葡萄球菌是从这些导管中培养出的主要微生物。9例双腔导管且发生导管相关表皮葡萄球菌感染的患者中有5例以及2例培养出表皮葡萄球菌的植入式系统患者正在接受选择性肠道去污处理。感染模式似乎未受该方案影响。完全植入式系统被证明与双腔中心静脉导管一样安全。

相似文献

1
Complications from long-term indwelling central venous catheters in hematologic patients with special reference to infection.血液系统疾病患者长期留置中心静脉导管的并发症,特别关注感染问题。
Cancer. 1989 Oct 15;64(8):1747-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891015)64:8<1747::aid-cncr2820640832>3.0.co;2-f.
2
[Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].[血液学患者隧道式中心静脉导管的感染性和非感染性并发症]
Sangre (Barc). 1999 Jun;44(3):176-81.
3
Totally implantable subcutaneous port system versus central venous catheter placed before induction chemotherapy in patients with acute leukaemia-a randomized study.
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Feb;12(2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0558-1. Epub 2003 Nov 25.
4
Frequency of infections associated with implanted systems vs cuffed, tunneled Silastic venous catheters in patients with acute leukemia.
Am J Dis Child. 1991 Dec;145(12):1433-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160120101028.
5
Central venous catheter infections in pediatric patients--in a community hospital.社区医院儿科患者的中心静脉导管感染
Infection. 1988 Mar-Apr;16(2):86-90. doi: 10.1007/BF01644309.
6
Glomerulonephritis associated with chronic infection from long-term central venous catheterization.与长期中心静脉置管所致慢性感染相关的肾小球肾炎
Pediatr Nephrol. 2006 Mar;21(3):427-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-005-2124-1. Epub 2005 Dec 16.
7
Risk factors for infectious and noninfectious complications of totally implantable venous catheters in cancer patients.癌症患者完全植入式静脉导管感染和非感染性并发症的危险因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Apr;4(2):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.10.008.
8
Prospective study of infections in indwelling central venous catheters using quantitative blood cultures.
Am J Med. 1988 Oct;85(4):495-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(88)80084-6.
9
Accuracy of totally implanted ports, tunnelled, single- and multiple-lumen central venous catheters for measurement of central venous pressure.完全植入式端口、隧道式单腔和多腔中心静脉导管用于测量中心静脉压的准确性。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1837-42. doi: 10.1007/s001340000705.
10
Complications of indwelling venous access devices in patients with gynecologic malignancies.妇科恶性肿瘤患者留置静脉通路装置的并发症
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Dec;91(3):591-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation of Complications Following Port Insertion in a Cancer Patient Population: A Retrospective Analysis.癌症患者群体中端口插入术后并发症的调查:一项回顾性分析。
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2019 Apr 24;13:1179554919844770. doi: 10.1177/1179554919844770. eCollection 2019.
2
Comparison of three types of central venous catheters in patients with malignant tumor receiving chemotherapy.三种中心静脉导管在接受化疗的恶性肿瘤患者中的比较。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jul 12;11:1197-1204. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S142556. eCollection 2017.
3
Hickman catheter and implantable port devices for the delivery of chemotherapy: a phase II randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
用于化疗给药的希克曼导管和植入式端口装置:一项II期随机对照试验及经济学评估。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Apr 26;114(9):979-85. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.76. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
4
epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.epic3:英格兰国民保健署医院内医源性感染预防的国家循证指南。
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Jan;86 Suppl 1:S1-70. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60012-2.
5
Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.比较非血液恶性肿瘤患者接受化疗时使用外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)与皮下植入式港室导管的并发症和成本。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jan;22(1):121-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1941-1. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
The Latent Risk of Acidosis in Commercially Available Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Products: a Randomized Clinical Trial in Postoperative Patients.市售全肠外营养(TPN)产品酸中毒潜在风险:术后患者的随机临床试验。
J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2009 Jul;45(1):68-73. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.08-260. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
7
Patients' perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia.患者对中心静脉导管或完全植入式皮下端口系统的认知——一项急性白血病随机研究的结果
Support Care Cancer. 2009 Feb;17(2):137-43. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0449-6. Epub 2008 May 1.
8
epic2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.《英格兰国民保健服务体系(NHS)医院预防医疗相关感染的国家循证指南2》
J Hosp Infect. 2007 Feb;65 Suppl 1:S1-64. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(07)60002-4.
9
Totally implantable venous catheters for chemotherapy: experience in 500 patients.用于化疗的完全植入式静脉导管:500例患者的经验
Sao Paulo Med J. 2004 Jul 1;122(4):147-51. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802004000400003. Epub 2004 Nov 9.
10
Totally implantable subcutaneous port system versus central venous catheter placed before induction chemotherapy in patients with acute leukaemia-a randomized study.
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Feb;12(2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0558-1. Epub 2003 Nov 25.