Suppr超能文献

完全植入式端口、隧道式单腔和多腔中心静脉导管用于测量中心静脉压的准确性。

Accuracy of totally implanted ports, tunnelled, single- and multiple-lumen central venous catheters for measurement of central venous pressure.

作者信息

Blot F, Laplanche A, Raynard B, Germann N, Antoun S, Nitenberg G

机构信息

Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2000 Dec;26(12):1837-42. doi: 10.1007/s001340000705.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To verify the accuracy of totally implanted ports, tunnelled central venous catheters (CVC), widely used in cancer patients, and multi-lumen catheters, used in intensive care units (ICUs), in measuring central venous pressure (CVP), using right atrial pressure (RAP) measured in a Swan-Ganz catheter as the reference standard.

DESIGN

A prospective study, over a 10-month period.

SETTING

A medical-surgical ICU in a comprehensive cancer centre.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients who had both (1) a Swan-Ganz catheter and (2) either a tunnelled catheter, a single or a multi-lumen catheter, or a totally implanted port.

INTERVENTIONS

RAP and CVP were measured simultaneously in each patient.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Fifty-six pairs of RAP-CVP measurements were performed in 35 patients: 6 tunnelled catheters, 6 non-tunnelled single-lumen catheters, 26 multiple-lumen catheters and 18 totally implanted ports were studied. RAP measured in the Swan-Ganz catheter and CVP measured in the CVC were strongly correlated (r = 0.94, p < 0.01), whatever the type of catheter studied. The mean difference between RAP and CVP was -0.39 +/- 1.73 (SD) mmHg. In 51 cases (91%), the difference was within the limits of agreement (-3.78 to 3.00 mmHg, Bland and Altman method). For the five cases with a difference of 4 mmHg (three totally implanted ports, one double- and one triple-lumen catheter), CVP was greater than RAP.

CONCLUSIONS

CVP can be accurately measured in totally implanted ports, tunnelled or non-tunnelled single-lumen and multiple-lumen catheters. When the difference exceeds the limit of agreement, the discrepancy between the two measurements has limited significance in most cases.

摘要

目的

以Swan-Ganz导管测量的右心房压力(RAP)作为参考标准,验证完全植入式端口、广泛应用于癌症患者的隧道式中心静脉导管(CVC)以及重症监护病房(ICU)中使用的多腔导管在测量中心静脉压(CVP)方面的准确性。

设计

一项为期10个月的前瞻性研究。

地点

一家综合癌症中心的内科-外科重症监护病房。

患者和参与者

同时具备(1)一根Swan-Ganz导管和(2)一根隧道式导管、单腔或多腔导管或完全植入式端口的患者。

干预措施

在每位患者中同时测量RAP和CVP。

测量和结果

对35例患者进行了56对RAP-CVP测量:研究了6根隧道式导管、6根非隧道式单腔导管、26根多腔导管和18个完全植入式端口。无论研究的导管类型如何,Swan-Ganz导管测量的RAP与CVC测量的CVP均呈强相关(r = 0.94,p < 0.01)。RAP与CVP的平均差值为-0.39 ± 1.73(标准差)mmHg。在51例(91%)中,差值在一致性界限内(-3.78至3.00 mmHg,Bland和Altman方法)。对于差值为4 mmHg的5例(3个完全植入式端口、1个双腔和1个三腔导管),CVP大于RAP。

结论

在完全植入式端口、隧道式或非隧道式单腔和多腔导管中均可准确测量CVP。当差值超过一致性界限时,在大多数情况下,两次测量之间的差异意义有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验