Suppr超能文献

使用更新版STOPP-START标准评估社区老年患者潜在不适当处方:与原始版本的特征和患病率比较

Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Community-Dwelling Older Patients Using the Updated Version of STOPP-START Criteria: A Comparison of Profiles and Prevalences with Respect to the Original Version.

作者信息

Blanco-Reina Encarnación, García-Merino Maria Rosa, Ocaña-Riola Ricardo, Aguilar-Cano Lorena, Valdellós Jennifer, Bellido-Estévez Inmaculada, Ariza-Zafra Gabriel

机构信息

Pharmacology and Therapeutics Department, Medical School, Málaga Biomedical Institute (IBIMA), University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.

Health District of Córdoba Sur, Córdoba, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167586. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Emerging and changing evidence made it necessary to update STOPP-START criteria, and version 2 was published recently. In this study the objectives were to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication prescribing (PIM) in primary care using STOPP versions 1 (v1) and 2 (v2), as well as 2012 AGS Beers criteria, and analyze the factors associated with inappropriate prescribing according to STOPP/START v2. A cross-sectional study was carried out including community-dwelling older adults over the age of 65. Sociodemographic, clinical, functional and comprehensive drug therapy data were collected. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients receiving at least one PIM. This variable was measured using three tools: STOPP v1, 2012 AGS Beers criteria and STOPP v2. Similarly, the percentage of patients receiving at least one potential prescribing omission (PPO) was calculated using START versions 1 and 2. A total of 1,615 prescriptions were reviewed. The median number of medications per patient was 7.1 drugs (±3.8). The prevalence of elderly people exposed to polypharmacy (≥5 medications) was 72.9%, whereas 28.4% of the participants took ≥10 drugs regularly. PIM were present in 18.7%, 37.3% and 40.4% of participants, according to the STOPP v1, 2012 Beers criteria and STOPP v2, respectively. According to STOPP v2, the number of medications taken (OR: 1.14, 1.06-1.25), the presence of a psychological disorder (OR: 2.22, 1.13-4.37) and insomnia (OR: 3.35, 1.80-6.32) were risk factors for taking a PIM. The prevalence of PPOs was 34.7% and 21.8% according to version 1 and 2, respectively. In conclusion, STOPP-START criteria have been remarkably modified, which is evidenced by the different prevalence rates detected using version 2, as compared to version 1. In fact, the level of agreement between version 1 and the updated version is only moderate. Special attention should be paid on benzodiazepines, which keep being the most frequent PIM.

摘要

新出现和不断变化的证据使得更新STOPP-START标准成为必要,其第2版最近已发布。在本研究中,目标是使用STOPP第1版(v1)和第2版(v2)以及2012年美国老年医学会(AGS)Beers标准来确定初级保健中潜在不适当用药处方(PIM)的患病率,并根据STOPP/START v2分析与不适当处方相关的因素。开展了一项横断面研究,纳入了65岁以上的社区居住老年人。收集了社会人口学、临床、功能和综合药物治疗数据。主要终点是接受至少一种PIM的患者百分比。使用三种工具测量该变量:STOPP v1、2012年AGS Beers标准和STOPP v2。同样,使用START第1版和第2版计算接受至少一种潜在处方遗漏(PPO)的患者百分比。共审查了1615份处方。每位患者的药物中位数为7.1种(±3.8)。服用多种药物(≥5种药物)的老年人患病率为72.9%,而2

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验