Suppr超能文献

通过STOPP-START标准检测到的潜在不适当处方:它们真的不适当吗?

Potentially inappropriate prescribing detected by STOPP-START criteria: are they really inappropriate?

作者信息

Lozano-Montoya Isabel, Vélez-Diaz-Pallarés Manuel, Delgado-Silveira Eva, Montero-Errasquin Beatriz, Cruz Jentoft Alfonso Jose

机构信息

Servicio de Geriatria, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):861-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv079. Epub 2015 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

the STOPP-START criteria were developed to detect potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older people. The reasons why multidisciplinary geriatric teams decide not to follow STOPP-START criteria have not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

to analyse compliance with the recommendations of the STOPP-START criteria in older inpatients.

DESIGN

ambispective, non-randomised study. SUBJECTS SETTING: three hundred and eighty-eight consecutive patients aged 80 years or over admitted to the acute geriatric medicine unit of a University hospital.

METHODS

STOPP-START criteria were systematically used by a pharmacist to assess pre-admission treatments, and the multidisciplinary geriatric team decided what drugs were recommended after discharge. Two researches independently assessed how many STOPP-START recommendations were accepted by the team, and if they were not accepted, why.

RESULTS

two hundred and eighty-four PIPs were identified (0.8 per subject) according to STOPP criteria. Two hundred and forty-seven of these prescriptions (87.0%) were discontinued at discharge. STOPP recommendations were not accepted in 37 cases, mostly because the team considered other therapeutic priorities (lorazepam, n = 12; risperidone, n = 5; other, n = 18). Three hundred and ninety-seven PIPs were identified according to START criteria (1.1 per subject). START recommendations were not followed at discharge in 264 cases (66.5%). The most frequent reasons were as follows: severe disability (n = 90), the use of other effective treatments for the condition (n = 38) and high risk of severe adverse effects (n = 32). Not following START criteria was significantly associated with dependency for basic activities of daily living (ADLs) (odds ratio, OR: 0.66 for compliance with a recommendation; 0.49-0.89), dependency for instrumental ADLs (OR: 0.64; 0.48-0.85) or inability to walk (OR: 0.72; 0.54-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

potentially inappropriate drugs are usually discontinued, but many older hospitalised patients do not receive potentially recommended medications. More research on the reasons and consequences of this fact is needed.

摘要

背景

STOPP-START标准旨在检测老年人中潜在的不适当处方(PIP)。多学科老年医学团队不遵循STOPP-START标准的原因尚未得到研究。

目的

分析老年住院患者对STOPP-START标准建议的依从性。

设计

前瞻性、非随机研究。研究对象及地点:一所大学医院急性老年医学科连续收治的388例80岁及以上患者。

方法

由一名药剂师系统地使用STOPP-START标准评估入院前的治疗情况,多学科老年医学团队决定出院后推荐使用哪些药物。两名研究人员独立评估团队接受了多少STOPP-START建议,以及如果未被接受,原因是什么。

结果

根据STOPP标准确定了284例PIP(每位患者0.8例)。其中247例处方(87.0%)在出院时停用。37例中STOPP建议未被接受,主要是因为团队认为有其他治疗重点(劳拉西泮,n = 12;利培酮,n = 5;其他,n = 18)。根据START标准确定了397例PIP(每位患者1.1例)。264例(66.5%)出院时未遵循START建议。最常见的原因如下:严重残疾(n = 90)、针对该病症使用了其他有效治疗方法(n = 38)以及严重不良反应的高风险(n = 32)。不遵循START标准与日常生活基本活动(ADL)依赖显著相关(比值比,OR:遵循建议为0.66;0.49 - 0.89)、工具性ADL依赖(OR:0.64;0.48 - 0.85)或无法行走(OR:0.72;0.54 - 0.98)。

结论

潜在的不适当药物通常会停用,但许多老年住院患者未接受潜在推荐的药物。需要对这一事实的原因和后果进行更多研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验