Liu Qiu-Song, Mei Que-Lin, Li Yan-Hao
Department of Interventional Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, North of Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No.1838, North of Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou 510515, China.
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Apr;89:277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) terminal chemoembolization and to identify the prognostic factors associated with survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with hepatic arteriovenous shunts (HAVS).
Of 133 patients' managements were retrospectively analyzed. HAVS was classified into three types: slow-flow, intermediate-flow and high-flow. The size of the PVA used was determined following the scheme: slow-flow HAVS: 300-500μm PVA; intermediate-flow HAVS: 500-710μm PVA; high-flow HAVS: 710-1000μm PVA. The HCCs with slow-flow and intermediate-flow HAVS were embolized by PVA plus chemotherapeutic agents lipiodol emulsion, while the high-flow HAVS were treated by PVA with chemotherapeutic agents. Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. The influence of possible prognostic factors on survival were analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional-hazards method.
The median overall survival (OS) of 133 patients was 9.1 months. The median OS of the slow-flow type, intermediate-flow type and high-flow type patients were 10.8, 9.1 and 7.3 months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference among different HAVS types (P=0.239). The 30-day mortality was 3.8%. Cox multivariate survival analysis revealed that initial preoperative AFP value≥400ng/ml (HR=2.105, P=0.006) was an independent risk factor. While multiple embolization (HR=0.482, P=0.011), tumor remission (HR=0.431, P=0.041) and multimodality therapy (HR=0.416, P=0.004) were independent protection factors.
It is safe and effective for HCCs with HAVS treated by terminal chemoembolization therapy with PVA plus chemotherapeutic agents lipiodol emulsion (or PVA plus chemotherapeutic agents). The HCCs with HAVS achieves good prognosis with multiple embolization, tumor remission and multimodality therapy, while achieves poor prognosis with inital preoperative high AFP value (≥400ng/ml).
评估聚乙烯醇(PVA)终末化疗栓塞术的安全性和有效性,并确定与伴有肝动静脉分流(HAVS)的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者生存相关的预后因素。
回顾性分析133例患者的治疗情况。HAVS分为三种类型:慢血流型、中血流型和快血流型。PVA的使用尺寸按照以下方案确定:慢血流型HAVS:300 - 500μm的PVA;中血流型HAVS:500 - 710μm的PVA;快血流型HAVS:710 - 1000μm的PVA。伴有慢血流型和中血流型HAVS的HCC用PVA加化疗药物碘油乳剂进行栓塞,而快血流型HAVS用PVA加化疗药物进行治疗。采用Kaplan - Meier法计算生存曲线,并通过对数秩检验进行比较。采用多因素Cox比例风险法分析可能的预后因素对生存的影响。
133例患者的中位总生存期(OS)为9.1个月。慢血流型、中血流型和快血流型患者的中位OS分别为10.8、9.1和7.3个月。不同HAVS类型之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.239)。30天死亡率为3.8%。Cox多因素生存分析显示,术前初始甲胎蛋白(AFP)值≥400ng/ml(HR = 2.105,P = 0.006)是独立危险因素。而多次栓塞(HR = 0.482,P = 0.011)、肿瘤缓解(HR = 0.431,P = 0.041)和多模式治疗(HR = 0.416,P = 0.004)是独立保护因素。
用PVA加化疗药物碘油乳剂(或PVA加化疗药物)进行终末化疗栓塞术治疗伴有HAVS的HCC是安全有效的。伴有HAVS的HCC通过多次栓塞、肿瘤缓解和多模式治疗可获得良好预后,而术前初始AFP值高(≥400ng/ml)则预后较差。