Women's College Research Institute at Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, Canada; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 10 Victoria Street, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Nov;13(6):1045-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
Recognizing the potential effect of sex and gender on health outcomes, there is a shift toward conducting sex and gender-based analysis (SGBA) within health research. However, little is known about the extent to which SGBA has been incorporated into pharmacy practice research.
To understand the extent to which SGBA is included in pharmacy practice research.
Scoping review of English-language studies identified through MEDLINE, Embase, International Pharmacy Abstracts (IPA), and CINAHL (inception to Jan 2014). Two raters independently screened citations to identify titles and abstracts that included key words related to sex or gender and studies that could be categorized as pharmacy practice research. One author extracted data from included studies related to study design, population, intervention/exposure and outcomes, with results reviewed by another. All authors reviewed eligible articles to categorize them based on a previously-developed typology, and to assess four criteria: 1) the inclusion of sex or gender in research objectives, 2) the depth of sex/gender analysis incorporated into study designs and reporting, 3) the inclusion of sex or gender considerations in interpretation of study results, 4) the intentional and accurate use of sex/gender language.
Of 458 unique search results, only six articles met the inclusion criteria. Two of these six publications included sex/gender considerations in a model consistent with sex/gender based analysis as described by Hammarström. Three of the six studies inaccurately applied sex and gender terminology, whereas the two studies that featured sex or gender in their primary research question did use these terms appropriately.
Despite increasing attention on the need for considering sex and gender, there was a paucity of pharmacy practice research publications that conducted SGBA. This presents an opportunity to explore sex, gender and intersectionality when pursuing studies that explore the impact of pharmacists interventions on patient outcomes.
认识到性别对健康结果的潜在影响,健康研究领域正在转向进行基于性别的分析。然而,对于基于性别的分析在药学实践研究中的应用程度知之甚少。
了解基于性别的分析在药学实践研究中的应用程度。
通过 MEDLINE、Embase、国际药学文摘(IPA)和 CINAHL(从建库起至 2014 年 1 月)对英文研究进行范围界定综述。两名审核员独立筛选引文,以确定包含与性别相关的关键词的标题和摘要,以及可归类为药学实践研究的研究。一名作者从纳入的研究中提取与研究设计、人群、干预/暴露和结局相关的数据,结果由另一名作者进行审核。所有作者均对符合条件的文章进行审核,根据之前制定的分类法对其进行分类,并评估以下四个标准:1)研究目标中纳入性别,2)研究设计和报告中纳入性/别分析的深度,3)在解释研究结果时纳入性别考虑因素,4)有针对性地准确使用性/别语言。
在 458 个独特的搜索结果中,只有 6 篇文章符合纳入标准。这 6 篇出版物中有 2 篇的内容与 Hammarström 所述的基于性别的分析模型一致,考虑了性别因素。其中 3 篇研究不准确地应用了性和性别术语,而另外 2 篇将性别列入其主要研究问题的研究则恰当地使用了这些术语。
尽管越来越关注需要考虑性别,但在进行基于性别的分析的药学实践研究出版物中却相对匮乏。这为探索药师干预对患者结局的影响时探索性别、性别和交叉性提供了机会。