Kim Sunghye, Slaven James E, Ang Dennis C
From the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, and Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
S. Kim, MD, MMSc, Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine; J.E. Slaven, MS, Biostatistician, Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University; D.C. Ang, MD, MS, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine.
J Rheumatol. 2017 Apr;44(4):505-511. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.161003. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
Given the known side effects of opioids and their potential effects on cognition, we sought to evaluate the benefits of motivational interviewing (MI) to promote physical activity on 2 subsets of participants with fibromyalgia (FM): nonusers and users of opioids.
This was a secondary data analysis of a 36-week randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of MI to promote physical activity among participants with FM. Participants were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms: 6 phone-based MI sessions (n = 107) or 6 sessions of FM self-management instructions [attention control (AC), n = 109]. The primary outcomes were changes in physical function (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36), pain severity (Brief Pain Inventory), global FM symptom severity (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), and the amount of light to moderate physical activity (LMPA) from baseline to each followup visit. At study entry, subjects were categorized as opioid nonusers versus users. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess treatment effects adjusting for potential confounders.
Of the 216 participants, 145 (67%) were nonusers and 71 (33%) were opioid users. Among nonusers, MI was associated with improved physical function, reduced pain severity, and global FM severity, and increased LMPA at 6-month followup. Among opioid users, there were no significant differences in any outcome measures between the MI and AC groups.
Exercise-based MI was associated with sustained clinical benefits 6 months after completion of therapy, but only for those who were not taking opioids.
鉴于阿片类药物已知的副作用及其对认知的潜在影响,我们试图评估动机性访谈(MI)对促进纤维肌痛(FM)患者两个亚组进行体育活动的益处:未使用阿片类药物者和使用阿片类药物者。
这是一项对一项为期36周的随机对照试验进行的二次数据分析,以评估MI对促进FM患者体育活动的疗效。参与者被随机分为两个治疗组之一:6次基于电话的MI课程(n = 107)或6次FM自我管理指导课程[注意力控制(AC),n = 109]。主要结局指标为从基线到每次随访时身体功能(医学结局研究简表-36)、疼痛严重程度(简明疼痛量表)、FM总体症状严重程度(纤维肌痛影响问卷)以及轻度至中度体育活动(LMPA)量的变化。在研究开始时,受试者被分类为未使用阿片类药物者与使用阿片类药物者。采用重复测量方差分析来评估调整潜在混杂因素后的治疗效果。
在216名参与者中,145名(67%)为未使用阿片类药物者,71名(33%)为使用阿片类药物者。在未使用阿片类药物者中,MI与6个月随访时身体功能改善、疼痛严重程度降低、FM总体严重程度降低以及LMPA增加相关。在使用阿片类药物者中,MI组和AC组在任何结局指标上均无显著差异。
基于运动的MI在治疗完成6个月后与持续的临床益处相关,但仅适用于未服用阿片类药物的患者。