Suppr超能文献

电极间心房导联距离对Acapconfirm™可行性的影响。

Influence Of Inter Electrode Atrial Lead Distance On Acapconfirm™ Viability.

作者信息

Lapuerta Irigoyen J A, Valverde Andre I, Vigil Escalera P, Vasserot Gonzalez M

机构信息

Cabuenes Hospital, Gijon, Spain.

出版信息

J Atr Fibrillation. 2016 Aug 31;9(2):1386. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1386. eCollection 2016 Aug-Sep.

Abstract

The AcapConfirm™ feature available with the Zephyr pacemaker family (St. Jude Medical) is designed for monitoring patient's atrial capture threshold periodically, and automatically adjusting the atrial pulse amplitude. Previous studies showed a relative low proportion of patients at three months follow-up with recommended automatic atrial capture after the AcapConfirm™ viability test. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of inter electrode distance on the viability of the AcapConfirm™ algorithm. 132 patients (66 woman and 86 men; 71, 08 ± 8, 04 years old) were enrolled into this prospective evaluation. Sixty six bipolar leads (models 1882 (54p) and LPA1200M (12p)) with an inter electrode distance of 10 mm (Group A) were compared with sixty six bipolar leads (model 1999) with an inter electrode distance of 1,1mm (Group B). Set-up test AcapConfirm viability and manual step-down atrial threshold test as well as automatic threshold testing by AcapConfirm™ were performed at 3 months after implantation. A positive viability of the AcapConfirm™ algorithm was much lower in Group B (37, 9%; 95% confidence interval, 10, 3% - 65, 4%) versus thirty two patients (48, 5%; 95% confidence interval, 20, 9% - 76%) in Group A. However, the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=1, 51; p=0, 33). The most frequent reason to reject the AcapConfirm activation was a too small evoked response to polarization ratio (N9).At 3 months, threshold results from the AcapConfirm™ positive test were: 0, 53 ± 0, 13 V in Group B versus 0, 67 ± 0, 18 V in Group A (p< 0, 01). The differences between automatic and manual measurements were ≤0.25V in all patients. We observed that a short inter electrode distance (1,1mm) is more likely correlated with a lower frequency of AcapConfirm™ viability and threshold that a standard inter electrode distance (10mm). A small evoked response to polarization ratio was the most common cause of a negative test of AcapConfirm™ viability.

摘要

圣犹达医疗公司的Zephyr起搏器系列所具备的AcapConfirm™功能旨在定期监测患者的心房捕捉阈值,并自动调整心房脉冲幅度。先前的研究表明,在AcapConfirm™可行性测试后三个月随访时,达到推荐的自动心房捕捉的患者比例相对较低。本研究的目的是评估电极间距对AcapConfirm™算法可行性的影响。132例患者(66例女性和86例男性;年龄71.08±8.04岁)被纳入这项前瞻性评估。将66根电极间距为10毫米的双极导联(型号1882(54根)和LPA1200M(12根))(A组)与66根电极间距为1.1毫米的双极导联(型号1999)(B组)进行比较。在植入后3个月进行AcapConfirm可行性设置测试、手动逐步降低心房阈值测试以及AcapConfirm™自动阈值测试。AcapConfirm™算法的可行性在B组中低得多(37.9%;95%置信区间,10.3%-65.4%),而A组有32例患者(48.5%;95%置信区间,20.9%-76%)。然而,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.51;p=0.33)。拒绝激活AcapConfirm的最常见原因是极化率诱发反应过小(N9)。在3个月时,AcapConfirm™阳性测试的阈值结果为:B组为0.53±0.13伏,A组为0.67±0.18伏(p<0.01)。所有患者自动测量和手动测量之间的差异≤0.25伏。我们观察到,与标准电极间距(10毫米)相比,较短的电极间距(1.1毫米)更有可能与AcapConfirm™可行性和阈值的较低频率相关。对极化率的小诱发反应是AcapConfirm™可行性测试呈阴性的最常见原因。

相似文献

1
Influence Of Inter Electrode Atrial Lead Distance On Acapconfirm™ Viability.
J Atr Fibrillation. 2016 Aug 31;9(2):1386. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1386. eCollection 2016 Aug-Sep.
2
Performance evaluation of a right atrial automatic capture verification algorithm using two different sensing configurations.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 May;32(5):579-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02330.x.
3
Atrial evoked response integral for automatic capture verification in atrial pacing.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):248-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00026.x.
4
Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Mar;23(3):321-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb06756.x.
5
Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience.
J Arrhythm. 2017 Apr;33(2):139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
8
Clinical observation of atrial threshold monitoring algorithm: a single center experience.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):6079-84. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Muscle noise effects on atrial evoked response sensing: implications on atrial auto-threshold and auto-capture determination.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;34(4):460-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02992.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
2
Evaluation of the atrial evoked response for capture detection with high-polarization leads.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S57-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00059.x.
3
Automatic adjustment of pacing output in the clinical setting.
Am Heart J. 2004 Jan;147(1):127-31. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(03)00529-5.
4
Atrial evoked response integral for automatic capture verification in atrial pacing.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):248-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00026.x.
5
Autocapture enhancements: unipolar and bipolar lead compatibility and bipolar pacing capability on bipolar leads.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):221-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00020.x.
6
Reduction of pacing output coupling capacitance for sensing the evoked response.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Sep;24(9 Pt 1):1377-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01377.x.
7
The impact of automatic threshold tracking on pulse generator longevity in patients with different chronic stimulation thresholds.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1788-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07019.x.
8
Benefits in projected pacemaker longevity and in pacing related costs conferred by automatic threshold tracking.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov;23(11 Pt 2):1783-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07018.x.
9
The measurement of the paced depolarization integral using the braided endocardial lead.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1996-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03009.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验