Department of Medical Microbiology, Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Drugs. 2016 Dec;76(18):1737-1757. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0667-z.
Solithromycin is a novel fluoroketolide developed in both oral and intravenous formulations to address increasing macrolide resistance in pathogens causing community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). When compared with its macrolide and ketolide predecessors, solithromycin has several structural modifications which increase its ribosomal binding and reduce its propensity to known macrolide resistance mechanisms. Solithromycin, like telithromycin, affects 50S ribosomal subunit formation and function, as well as causing frame-shift errors during translation. However, unlike telithromycin, which binds to two sites on the ribosome, solithromycin has three distinct ribosomal binding sites. Its desosamine sugar interacts at the A2058/A2059 cleft in domain V (as all macrolides do), an extended alkyl-aryl side chain interacts with base pair A752-U2609 in domain II (similar to telithromycin), and a fluorine at C-2 of solithromycin provides additional binding to the ribosome. Studies describing solithromycin activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae have reported that it does not induce erm-mediated resistance because it lacks a cladinose moiety, and that it is less susceptible than other macrolides to mef-mediated efflux due to its increased ribosomal binding and greater intrinsic activity. Solithromycin has demonstrated potent in vitro activity against the most common CABP pathogens, including macrolide-, penicillin-, and fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates of S. pneumoniae, as well as Haemophilus influenzae and atypical bacterial pathogens. Solithromycin displays multi-compartment pharmacokinetics, a large volume of distribution (>500 L), approximately 67% bioavailability when given orally, and serum protein binding of 81%. Its major metabolic pathway appears to follow cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, with metabolites of solithromycin undergoing biliary excretion. Its serum half-life is approximately 6-9 h, which is sufficient for once-daily administration. Pharmacodynamic activity is best described as fAUC/MIC (the ratio of the area under the free drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h to the minimum inhibitory concentration of the isolate). Solithromycin has completed one phase II and two phase III clinical trials in patients with CABP. In the phase II trial, oral solithromycin was compared with oral levofloxacin and demonstrated similar clinical success rates in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (84.6 vs 86.6%). Clinical success in the clinically evaluable patients group was 83.6% of patients receiving solithromycin compared with 93.1% for patients receiving levofloxacin. In SOLITAIRE-ORAL, a phase III trial which assessed patients receiving oral solithromycin or oral moxifloxacin for CABP, an equivalent (non-inferior) early clinical response in the ITT population was demonstrated for patients receiving either solithromycin (78.2%) or moxifloxacin (77.9%). In a separate phase III trial, SOLITAIRE-IV, patients receiving intravenous-to-oral solithromycin (79.3%) demonstrated non-inferiority as the primary outcome of early clinical response in the ITT population compared with patients receiving intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin (79.7%). Overall, solithromycin has been well tolerated in clinical trials, with gastrointestinal adverse events being most common, occurring in approximately 10% of patients. Transaminase elevation occurred in 5-10% of patients and generally resolved following cessation of therapy. None of the rare serious adverse events that occurred with telithromycin (i.e., hepatotoxicity) have been noted with solithromycin, possibly due to the fact that solithromycin (unlike telithromycin) does not possess a pyridine moiety in its chemical structure, which has been implicated in inhibiting nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Because solithromycin is a possible substrate and inhibitor of both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp), it may display drug interactions similar to macrolides such as clarithromycin. Overall, the in vitro activity, clinical efficacy, tolerability, and safety profile of solithromycin demonstrated to date suggest that it continues to be a promising treatment for CABP.
索利霉素是一种新型氟酮内酯,有口服和静脉两种剂型,用于解决社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)中日益增加的大环内酯类耐药问题。与它的大环内酯类和酮内酯类前体药物相比,索利霉素有几个结构修饰,这增加了它与核糖体的结合,并降低了它对已知的大环内酯类耐药机制的倾向。索利霉素与泰利霉素一样,影响 50S 核糖体亚基的形成和功能,并在翻译过程中导致移码错误。然而,与结合在核糖体上的两个位点的泰利霉素不同,索利霉素有三个不同的核糖体结合位点。它的去甲氨基糖与结构域 V 中的 A2058/A2059 裂隙相互作用(所有大环内酯类都这样),一个扩展的烷基-芳基侧链与结构域 II 中的碱基对 A752-U2609 相互作用(与泰利霉素相似),而索利霉素 C-2 上的氟原子提供了与核糖体的额外结合。描述索利霉素对肺炎链球菌活性的研究报告称,它不会诱导 erm 介导的耐药性,因为它缺乏 cladinose 部分,而且由于其结合增加和更大的内在活性,它对 mef 介导的外排的敏感性低于其他大环内酯类药物。索利霉素对最常见的 CABP 病原体表现出强大的体外活性,包括对大环内酯类、青霉素类和氟喹诺酮类耐药的肺炎链球菌分离株,以及流感嗜血杆菌和非典型细菌病原体。索利霉素显示出多室药代动力学特征,分布容积大(>500 L),口服给药时约 67%的生物利用度,血清蛋白结合率为 81%。它的主要代谢途径似乎遵循细胞色素 P450(CYP)3A4,索利霉素的代谢产物经胆汁排泄。它的血清半衰期约为 6-9 小时,足以每日一次给药。药效学活性最好描述为 fAUC/MIC(从 0 到 24 小时的游离药物浓度-时间曲线下面积与分离株的最低抑菌浓度的比值)。索利霉素已经完成了一项 II 期和两项 III 期临床试验,用于治疗 CABP 患者。在 II 期试验中,口服索利霉素与口服左氧氟沙星进行了比较,在意向治疗(ITT)人群中的临床治愈率相似(84.6% vs 86.6%)。在临床可评估患者组中,接受索利霉素治疗的患者的临床成功率为 83.6%,而接受左氧氟沙星治疗的患者为 93.1%。在 SOLITAIRE-ORAL 一项评估口服索利霉素或口服莫西沙星治疗 CABP 的 III 期试验中,ITT 人群的早期临床反应等效(非劣效),接受索利霉素(78.2%)或莫西沙星(77.9%)治疗的患者。在一项单独的 III 期试验 SOLITAIRE-IV 中,接受静脉注射-口服索利霉素治疗的患者(79.3%)在 ITT 人群中的早期临床反应主要结局与接受静脉注射-口服莫西沙星治疗的患者(79.7%)相比非劣效。总体而言,索利霉素在临床试验中耐受性良好,最常见的胃肠道不良事件发生率约为 10%。转氨酶升高发生在 5-10%的患者中,一般在停止治疗后会恢复正常。与泰利霉素(即肝毒性)相关的罕见严重不良事件均未在索利霉素中发现,可能是因为索利霉素(与泰利霉素不同)的化学结构中没有吡啶部分,该部分被认为可抑制烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体。由于索利霉素可能是 CYP3A4 和 P-糖蛋白(P-gp)的底物和抑制剂,因此它可能表现出与大环内酯类药物(如克拉霉素)相似的药物相互作用。总体而言,索利霉素迄今为止表现出的体外活性、临床疗效、耐受性和安全性特征表明,它仍然是治疗 CABP 的一种有前途的治疗方法。