Suppr超能文献

SOLITAIRE-IV:一项比较静脉-口服索利霉素与静脉-口服莫西沙星治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎的疗效和安全性的随机、双盲、多中心研究。

SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia.

机构信息

Summa Health System and Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio.

Diamond Clinic, Cracow, Poland.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 15;63(8):1007-1016. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw490. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Solithromycin, a novel macrolide antibiotic with both intravenous and oral formulations dosed once daily, has completed 2 global phase 3 trials for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

METHODS

A total of 863 adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team [PORT] class II-IV) were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous-to-oral solithromycin or moxifloxacin for 7 once-daily doses. All patients received 400 mg intravenously on day 1 and were permitted to switch to oral dosing when clinically indicated. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (10% margin) of solithromycin to moxifloxacin in achievement of early clinical response (ECR) assessed 3 days after first dose in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included demonstrating noninferiority in ECR in the microbiological ITT population (micro-ITT) and determination of investigator-assessed success rates at the short-term follow-up (SFU) visit 5-10 days posttherapy.

RESULTS

In the ITT population, 79.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.7% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, -0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 5.2). In the micro-ITT population, 80.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.1% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, 1.26; 95% CI, -8.1 to 10.6). In the ITT population, 84.6% of solithromycin patients and 88.6% of moxifloxacin patients achieved clinical success at SFU based on investigator assessment. Mostly mild/moderate infusion events led to higher incidence of adverse events overall in the solithromycin group. Other adverse events were comparable between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous-to-oral solithromycin was noninferior to intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin. Solithromycin has potential to provide an intravenous and oral option for monotherapy for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01968733.

摘要

背景

索利霉素是一种新型大环内酯类抗生素,具有静脉注射和口服两种剂型,每日一次给药。该药已完成两项用于治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎的全球 3 期临床试验。

方法

共有 863 例社区获得性细菌性肺炎(肺炎结局研究团队 [PORT] II-IV 级)患者按 1:1 比例随机分为索利霉素组或莫西沙星组,分别接受静脉注射-口服序贯治疗,每日 1 次,共 7 天。所有患者于第 1 天接受 400mg 静脉注射,当临床指征允许时可转换为口服治疗。主要终点为意向治疗人群(ITT)中,接受索利霉素治疗的患者与接受莫西沙星治疗的患者相比,在首次给药后第 3 天达到早期临床应答(ECR)的非劣效性(10%边界)。次要终点包括在 ITT 人群的微生物学意向治疗人群(micro-ITT)中证明 ECR 的非劣效性,以及在治疗后 5-10 天的短期随访(SFU)访视时,确定研究者评估的成功率。

结果

在 ITT 人群中,索利霉素组和莫西沙星组分别有 79.3%和 79.7%的患者达到 ECR(治疗差异,-0.46;95%置信区间[CI],-6.1 至 5.2)。在 micro-ITT 人群中,索利霉素组和莫西沙星组分别有 80.3%和 79.1%的患者达到 ECR(治疗差异,1.26;95%CI,-8.1 至 10.6)。在 ITT 人群中,基于研究者评估,索利霉素组和莫西沙星组分别有 84.6%和 88.6%的患者在 SFU 时达到临床成功。索利霉素组中大多数为轻度/中度输液事件,导致总体不良事件发生率较高。其他不良事件在治疗组之间无差异。

结论

静脉注射-口服序贯索利霉素与静脉注射-口服莫西沙星相比非劣效。索利霉素有潜力为社区获得性细菌性肺炎的单药治疗提供一种静脉和口服选择。

临床试验注册

NCT01968733。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验