• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对抗生素发生非速发型皮肤药物不良反应患者的阳性斑贴试验反应的长期可重复性

Long-term reproducibility of positive patch test reactions in patients with non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions to antibiotics.

作者信息

Pinho André, Marta Ana, Coutinho Inês, Gonçalo Margarida

机构信息

Dermatology Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-045, Coimbra, Portugal.

Faculty of Medicine, Clinic of Dermatology, University of Coimbra, 3000-045, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2017 Apr;76(4):204-209. doi: 10.1111/cod.12720. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1111/cod.12720
PMID:27910104
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As in contact allergy, T cell-mediated hypersensitivity in non-immediate (NI) cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) to antibiotics is considered to be lifelong, but, in this setting, patch tests have rarely been repeated after long time intervals.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term reproducibility of positive patch test reactions to antibiotics in patients with NI CADRs.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with NI CADRs to antibiotics who had relevant positive reactions during patch testing were invited to repeat patch tests with a similar antibiotic series 2-15 years thereafter.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included (9 males and 11 females; mean age 54.6 years): 18 with maculopapular exanthema, 1 with drug hypersensitivity syndrome, and 1 with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Results were reproducible in 17 of 20 patients after a mean interval of 6.0 years (range 2-14.7 years). Concerning β-lactams, 7 of 8 patients remained positive for aminopenicillins, 4 of 4 for isoxazolyl penicillins, and 1 for cefoxitin. Patch test results were also reproducible for clindamycin in 5 of 7 patients, for vancomycin in 1 patient, and for spiramycin in 1 patient. Reproducibility was not affected by the time interval between tests, sex, or age at testing.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of NI CADRs, we showed high reproducibility of positive patch test reactions to various antibiotics, even after several years.

摘要

背景

与接触性过敏一样,抗生素引起的非即刻(NI)皮肤药物不良反应(CADR)中,T细胞介导的超敏反应被认为是终身的,但在这种情况下,长时间间隔后很少重复进行斑贴试验。

目的

评估NI CADR患者对抗生素斑贴试验阳性反应的长期可重复性。

方法

邀请56例对抗生素有NI CADR且在斑贴试验期间有相关阳性反应的患者,在2至15年后用类似的抗生素系列重复进行斑贴试验。

结果

纳入20例患者(9例男性和11例女性;平均年龄54.6岁):18例为斑丘疹性皮疹,1例为药物超敏综合征,1例为急性泛发性脓疱性皮病。平均间隔6.0年(范围2至14.7年)后,20例患者中有17例结果可重复。关于β-内酰胺类,8例患者中有7例对氨基青霉素仍呈阳性,4例对异恶唑基青霉素均呈阳性,1例对头孢西丁呈阳性。7例患者中有5例对克林霉素、1例对万古霉素、1例对螺旋霉素的斑贴试验结果也可重复。可重复性不受两次试验之间的时间间隔、性别或试验时年龄的影响。

结论

在NI CADR的背景下,我们发现即使在数年之后,对各种抗生素的斑贴试验阳性反应仍具有很高的可重复性。

相似文献

1
Long-term reproducibility of positive patch test reactions in patients with non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions to antibiotics.对抗生素发生非速发型皮肤药物不良反应患者的阳性斑贴试验反应的长期可重复性
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 Apr;76(4):204-209. doi: 10.1111/cod.12720. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
2
Non-immediate reactions to beta-lactams: diagnostic value of skin testing and drug provocation test.β-内酰胺类药物的非即刻反应:皮肤试验和药物激发试验的诊断价值
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 May;38(5):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02961.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
3
Patch testing - a valuable tool for investigating non-immediate cutaneous adverse drug reactions to antibiotics.斑贴试验——一种用于调查对抗生素的非速发型皮肤药物不良反应的重要工具。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):280-287. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13796. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
4
Clindamycin-induced Maculopapular Exanthema with Preferential Involvement of Striae Distensae: A Koebner phenomenon?克林霉素诱发的斑丘疹伴膨胀纹优先受累:同形反应现象?
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Apr;26(1):61-63.
5
Antibiotic allergies in children and adults: from clinical symptoms to skin testing diagnosis.儿童和成人的抗生素过敏:从临床症状到皮肤点刺试验诊断。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;2(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.11.006.
6
The use of patch tests in the diagnosis of delayed hypersensitivity drug eruptions.斑贴试验在迟发型超敏反应性药疹诊断中的应用。
Int J Dermatol. 2016 Nov;55(11):1219-1224. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13306.
7
Diagnosing nonimmediate reactions to penicillins by in vivo tests.通过体内试验诊断对青霉素的非即刻反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002 Oct;129(2):169-74. doi: 10.1159/000065876.
8
Skin testing in delayed reactions to drugs.药物迟发型反应中的皮肤试验。
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009 Aug;29(3):517-35. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2009.04.010.
9
The Role of Patch Testing in Evaluating Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Medications.斑贴试验在评估药物迟发性超敏反应中的作用。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jun;62(3):548-561. doi: 10.1007/s12016-022-08924-2. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
10
Value of patch tests in clindamycin-related drug eruptions.斑贴试验在克林霉素相关性药物疹中的价值。
Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Oct;65(4):202-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01942.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools to improve the diagnosis and management of T-cell mediated adverse drug reactions.改善T细胞介导的药物不良反应诊断与管理的工具
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;9:923991. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923991. eCollection 2022.
2
Delabeling Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity: How Far Can You Safely Go?去标签化延迟药物过敏:你能走多远?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):2878-2895.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.005.
3
Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the German Society of Allergology (AeDA), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy (PEG).
β-内酰胺类抗生素疑似过敏诊断程序指南:德国变态反应与临床免疫学会(DGAKI)与德国变态反应学会(AeDA)、德国儿童变态反应与环境医学学会(GPA)、德国接触性皮炎研究组(DKG)、奥地利变态反应与免疫学会(ÖGAI)以及保罗·埃尔利希化疗学会(PEG)合作制定的指南
Allergol Select. 2020 May 28;4:11-43. doi: 10.5414/ALX02104E. eCollection 2020.
4
'Cephalosporin allergy' label is misleading.“头孢菌素过敏”标签具有误导性。
Aust Prescr. 2018 Apr;41(2):37-41. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2018.008. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
The Combined Utility of Ex Vivo IFN-γ Release Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot Assay and In Vivo Skin Testing in Patients with Antibiotic-Associated Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions.体外 IFN-γ 释放酶联免疫斑点检测与体内皮肤试验联合应用于抗生素相关性严重皮肤不良反应患者。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1287-1296.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
Non-immediate Cutaneous Reactions to Beta-Lactams: Approach to Diagnosis.β-内酰胺类药物非即刻型皮肤反应:诊断方法。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Apr;17(4):23. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0691-4.