Pinho A, Coutinho I, Gameiro A, Gouveia M, Gonçalo M
Department of Dermatology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Clinic of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):280-287. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13796. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
Antibiotics are among the most frequent causes of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR); patch testing may be an important tool in their evaluation and management. We assessed the role of patch testing as a diagnostic tool in non-immediate CADR to antibiotics, and evaluated cross-reactivity among them.
We reviewed data from all patients with non-immediate CADR attributed to antibiotics, which were patch tested between 2000 and 2014 at our dermatology department.
Patch tests were performed in 260 patients, and showed overall reactivity to antibiotics of 21.5%, especially in the context of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) (31.6%), maculopapular exanthema (MPE) (21.8%), Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (20%) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) (18.1%). Patch test reactivity was higher for amoxicillin, mainly in DRESS (44.4%) and MPE (25.6%), and dicloxacillin (50% in AGEP and 37.5% in MPE). Reactivity to clindamycin occurred, especially in the setting of MPE (23.2%). In AGEP and DRESS, patch tests were useful in detecting reactivity to quinolones (50-100%). Overall reactivity was lower for vancomycin (9.1%), co-trimoxazole (8.6%), macrolides (4.8%) and cephalosporins (4.4%). Positive patch tests for more than one antibiotic occurred in 29/56 cases (51.8%), mostly explained by cross-reactions. Twenty of 24 cases reacted to both amoxicillin and ampicillin. All five cases reacting to ciprofloxacin cross-reacted with other quinolones.
Although oral rechallenge is considered the gold standard for confirming drug imputability in CADR, patch testing could be suggested as a first choice in the study of non-immediate reactions, since it is a safe and valuable procedure.
抗生素是皮肤药物不良反应(CADR)最常见的原因之一;斑贴试验可能是评估和处理这些反应的重要工具。我们评估了斑贴试验作为诊断非速发型抗生素所致CADR的工具的作用,并评估了抗生素之间的交叉反应性。
我们回顾了2000年至2014年在我们皮肤科进行斑贴试验的所有非速发型抗生素所致CADR患者的数据。
对260例患者进行了斑贴试验,结果显示总体抗生素反应性为21.5%,尤其在伴有嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状的药物反应(DRESS)(31.6%)、斑丘疹性皮疹(MPE)(21.8%)、史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症(20%)和急性泛发性脓疱性皮病(AGEP)(18.1%)的情况下。阿莫西林的斑贴试验反应性较高,主要见于DRESS(44.4%)和MPE(25.6%),双氯西林也是如此(AGEP中为50%,MPE中为37.5%)。克林霉素也有反应,尤其在MPE情况下(23.2%)。在AGEP和DRESS中,斑贴试验有助于检测对喹诺酮类药物的反应性(50 - 100%)。万古霉素(9.1%)、复方新诺明(8.6%)、大环内酯类(4.8%)和头孢菌素类(4.4%)的总体反应性较低。56例中有29例(51.8%)对一种以上抗生素的斑贴试验呈阳性,大多由交叉反应所致。24例中有20例对阿莫西林和氨苄西林均有反应。对环丙沙星有反应的5例均与其他喹诺酮类药物发生交叉反应。
尽管口服激发试验被认为是确认CADR中药物归因的金标准,但斑贴试验可作为非速发型反应研究的首选方法,因为它是一种安全且有价值的程序。