Quinn Amity E, Brolin Mary, Stewart Maureen T, Evans Brooke, Horgan Constance
Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University.
Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum). 2016 Apr 27(46):1-50.
Risky, non-dependent alcohol use is prevalent in the United States, affecting 25% of adults (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2014b). Massachusetts has higher rates of alcohol use and binge drinking than most states (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2015). Serious physical, social, and economic consequences result. Excessive alcohol use contributes to cancer, cardiovascular disease, sleep disorders, birth defects, motor vehicle injuries, and suicide, and it complicates management of chronic illnesses (Green, McKnight-Eily, Tan, Mejia, & Denny, 2016; Laramee et al., 2015; Mokdad, Marks, Stroup, & Gerberding, 2004; Rehm et al., 2009). Excessive alcohol use is one of the top causes of death, and over 240 alcohol-related deaths occur daily in the US (Mokdad et al., 2004; Stahre, Roeber, Kanny, Brewer, & Zhang, 2014). In comparison, 78 people die from an opioid overdose each day (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). Excessive drinking is estimated to cost over $249 billion annually in the US and $5.6 billion in the Commonwealth (Sacks, Gonzales, Bouchery, Tomedi, & Brewer, 2015). This issue brief describes the scope of the risky drinking problem in the US and associated costs and consequences. The brief then examines the evidence base for tools to address risky drinking and outlines policy strategies that health care system stakeholders may employ to address further this critical public health issue. Screening and brief intervention (SBI) is an evidence-based, cost-effective practice to address risky alcohol use, typically using a short validated screening tool followed by a brief counseling session if a patient screens positive. Research shows SBI conducted in primary care outpatient settings significantly reduces alcohol use (Bertholet, Daeppen, Wietlisbach, Fleming, & Burnand, 2005b; Bien, Miller, & Tonigan, 1993; Kaner et al., 2009; Saitz, 2010a), hospitalizations (Fleming, Barry, Manwell, Johnson, & London, 1997b) and mortality (Cuijpers, Riper, & Lemmers, 2004). Alcohol SBI saves an estimated $217.95 per person screened (Barbosa, Cowell, Bray, & Aldridge, 2015).
在美国,危险的非依赖型酒精使用很普遍,影响着25%的成年人(疾病控制与预防中心,2014b)。马萨诸塞州的酒精使用和暴饮率高于大多数州(物质滥用和精神健康服务管理局,2015)。这会导致严重的身体、社会和经济后果。过度饮酒会引发癌症、心血管疾病、睡眠障碍、出生缺陷、机动车伤害和自杀,还会使慢性病的管理变得复杂(格林、麦克奈特 - 艾利、谭、梅希亚和丹尼,2016;拉腊米等人,2015;莫克德、马克斯、斯特鲁普和格伯丁,2004;雷姆等人,2009)。过度饮酒是主要死因之一,美国每天有超过240例与酒精相关的死亡(莫克德等人,2004;施塔尔、勒伯、坎尼、布鲁尔和张,2014)。相比之下,每天有78人死于阿片类药物过量(疾病控制与预防中心,2016)。据估计,美国每年因过度饮酒造成的损失超过2490亿美元,在马萨诸塞州为56亿美元(萨克斯、冈萨雷斯、布彻里、托梅迪和布鲁尔,2015)。本问题简报描述了美国危险饮酒问题的范围以及相关成本和后果。简报随后审视了应对危险饮酒工具的证据基础,并概述了医疗保健系统利益相关者可采用的政策策略,以进一步解决这一关键的公共卫生问题。筛查与简短干预(SBI)是一种基于证据且具有成本效益的应对危险酒精使用的做法,通常使用经过验证的简短筛查工具,如果患者筛查呈阳性,则随后进行简短的咨询会话。研究表明,在初级保健门诊环境中开展的SBI能显著减少酒精使用(贝托莱、戴彭、维特利斯巴赫、弗莱明和布尔南,2005b;比恩、米勒和托尼根,1993;卡纳等人,2009;赛茨,2010a)、住院率(弗莱明、巴里、曼韦尔、约翰逊和伦敦,1997b)和死亡率(库伊佩斯、里珀和莱默斯,2004)。对每个接受筛查的人而言,酒精SBI估计可节省成本217.95美元(巴尔博萨、考威尔、布雷和奥尔德里奇,2015)。