Benowitz Kyle M, McKinney Elizabeth C, Moore Allen J
Department of Genetics, University of Georgia, 120 East Green Street, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
J Ethol. 2016 Sep;34(3):315-319. doi: 10.1007/s10164-016-0477-5. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Burying beetles () are model parents among insects, with all studied species known to regurgitate flesh from vertebrate carcasses to their offspring. However, most studies focus on a very few species, yet the interpretation of the function and importance of care is typically generalized to all burying beetles. Here we characterize subtle variation within and between individuals and sexes, and how this variation differs between two species of burying beetle. We find that exhibits low variance, with a normal distribution of parental care provided during peak care periods. In , however, the distribution is more uniform as values of care are spread across the possible phenotypic spectrum. This suggests that there is stabilizing selection on care in , but relaxed or disruptive selection in . Although repeatability was similar between both species, transitions from other care behaviors into feeding were more common in than . Thus, while parenting is coarsely similar across the genus, variation in its expression should not be extrapolated to all . We suggest that subtle variation both within and among species merits greater attention, and could inform us about the factors that lead to different distributions of care.
埋葬虫在昆虫中是模范父母,所有已研究的物种都会将脊椎动物尸体上的肉反刍给它们的后代。然而,大多数研究只聚焦于极少数物种,而对亲代抚育功能和重要性的解读通常却推广到了所有埋葬虫。在此,我们描述了个体之间以及性别之间的细微差异,以及这种差异在两种埋葬虫之间是如何不同的。我们发现[物种名称1]表现出低方差,在抚育高峰期提供的亲代抚育呈正态分布。然而,在[物种名称2]中,由于抚育值分布在可能的表型范围内,其分布更为均匀。这表明在[物种名称1]中对抚育存在稳定选择,但在[物种名称2]中是放松或干扰选择。尽管两个物种的可重复性相似,但从其他抚育行为转变为喂食在[物种名称1]中比在[物种名称2]中更常见。因此,虽然整个属的育幼行为大致相似,但其表达的差异不应外推到所有[埋葬虫]。我们认为物种内部和物种之间的细微差异值得更多关注,并且可以让我们了解导致抚育不同分布的因素。