März Karoline, Adler Werner, Matta Ragai-Edward, Wolf Linda, Wichmann Manfred, Bergauer Bastian
Department of Prosthodontics, Erlangen University Hospital, Glückstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstraße 22, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 May;78(3):221-232. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0073-x. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
Orthodontists influence dental occlusion directly. To suggest any link between dental occlusion and body posture is highly contentious, as evidenced by the literature. Rasterstereography, an optical technique that enables three-dimensional (3D) body measurements to be collected, has not yet been used to impartially examine whether different occlusal positions could instantaneously alter spine and body posture. We therefore set out to use this technique to nonsubjectively evaluate this question under static conditions.
Optical body scans were collected for 44 subjects, using the Diers formetric 4D system, for seven different mandible positions. In total, ten spinal and body posture parameters were assessed (trunk inclination, trunk imbalance, pelvic tilt, pelvic torsion, fleche cervicale, fleche lombaire, kyphotic angle, lordotic angle, surface rotation, and lateral deviation) for each mandible position and compared with scans performed with habitual intercuspation (HIC).
Significant body posture deviations were found for the fleche cervicale (position of the mandible: right eccentrically), fleche lombaire (positions of the mandible: physiologic rest position, cotton rolls on both sides, bite elevation 1 mm), and the kyphotic angle (positions of the mandible: cotton rolls on both sides, right eccentrically). No other significant differences were detected.
Data for the parameters that varied with different dental occlusions generated high standard deviations. Therefore, within the limitations of this pilot study, we could not conclusively associate dental occlusion to an instantaneous impact on the tested parameters. The posture changes that we detected could also have arisen from individual neuromuscular compensation; a possibility that must now be ruled-in, or out, by further research studies with a higher number of subjects.
正畸医生直接影响牙合。正如文献所证明的,暗示牙合与身体姿势之间存在任何联系极具争议性。光栅立体摄影术是一种能够收集三维(3D)身体测量数据的光学技术,尚未被用于公正地研究不同的牙合位置是否会瞬间改变脊柱和身体姿势。因此,我们着手使用该技术在静态条件下对这个问题进行客观评估。
使用迪尔斯4D系统为44名受试者采集了七个不同下颌位置的光学身体扫描数据。总共评估了十个脊柱和身体姿势参数(躯干倾斜度、躯干不平衡度、骨盆倾斜度、骨盆扭转度、颈椎曲度、腰椎曲度、后凸角、前凸角、表面旋转度和侧方偏差),并将每个下颌位置的参数与习惯性牙尖交错位(HIC)扫描结果进行比较。
发现颈椎曲度(下颌位置:右侧偏位)、腰椎曲度(下颌位置:生理休息位、双侧放置棉卷、咬合抬高1毫米)和后凸角(下颌位置:双侧放置棉卷、右侧偏位)存在显著的身体姿势偏差。未检测到其他显著差异。
不同牙合情况下变化参数的数据产生了较高的标准差。因此,在这项初步研究的局限性内,我们无法确凿地将牙合与对测试参数的即时影响联系起来。我们检测到的姿势变化也可能是个体神经肌肉补偿引起的;这一可能性现在必须通过对更多受试者进行的进一步研究来确定或排除。