Tabor Piotr, Palczewska Iwona, Grygiel Rafał, Olszewska Elżbieta, Chwała Wiesław, Mastalerz Andrzej
Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 9;35(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04269-6.
The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two spine models: the broken curve model and a new four tangent circles model. The modification concerns the adaptation of data acquisition to kinematic methods used in, e.g., gait and running analysis.
Plastic, movable spine model of human with flexible intervertebral disks (manufactured by Erler Zimmer GE3014) was used as the study material. Markers with a diameter of 5 mm were glued to each spinous process (from C to L). The recording was performed with a 6-camera Vicon system. Two spine models were created: a broken curve model used, among others, in the Diers scanner, and an own model of 4 circles, similar to the model of circles used in X-ray and CT analysis.
The errors in the position of the spinous processes were significantly smaller in the 4-circle model than in the broken curve model. They ranged from 0.01 to 6.5 mm in the lumbar section, from 0.004 to 3.1 mm in the thoracic section. The practical possibilities of using the four-circle model during the cinematographic analysis of gait and run should be checked.
The four-circle model is more accurate than the broken curve model and can be used in the cinematographic analysis of the human spine movement.
本研究旨在比较两种脊柱模型的准确性:折线模型和一种新的四切线圆模型。改进之处在于使数据采集适应例如步态和跑步分析中所使用的运动学方法。
使用带有可弯曲椎间盘的人体塑料可移动脊柱模型(由埃勒·齐默尔制造,型号GE3014)作为研究材料。将直径5毫米的标记物粘贴到每个棘突上(从颈椎到腰椎)。使用6台摄像机的Vicon系统进行记录。创建了两种脊柱模型:一种是折线模型,例如在迪尔斯扫描仪中使用;另一种是我们自己的四圆模型,类似于X射线和CT分析中使用的圆模型。
四圆模型中棘突位置的误差明显小于折线模型。在腰椎部分,误差范围为0.01至6.5毫米;在胸椎部分,误差范围为0.004至3.1毫米。应检验在步态和跑步的影片分析中使用四圆模型的实际可能性。
四圆模型比折线模型更准确,可用于人体脊柱运动的影片分析。