Dietrich Melanie H, Ogden Kristen M, Katen Sarah P, Reiss Kerstin, Sutherland Danica M, Carnahan Robert H, Goff Matthew, Cooper Tracy, Dermody Terence S, Stehle Thilo
Interfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Virol. 2017 Jan 31;91(4). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01621-16. Print 2017 Feb 15.
Reovirus attachment protein σ1 engages glycan receptors and junctional adhesion molecule-A (JAM-A) and is thought to undergo a conformational change during the proteolytic disassembly of virions to infectious subvirion particles (ISVPs) that accompanies cell entry. The σ1 protein is also the primary target of neutralizing antibodies. Here, we present a structural and functional characterization of two neutralizing antibodies that target σ1 of serotype 1 (T1) and serotype 3 (T3) reoviruses. The crystal structures revealed that each antibody engages its cognate σ1 protein within the head domain via epitopes distinct from the JAM-A-binding site. Surface plasmon resonance and cell-binding assays indicated that both antibodies likely interfere with JAM-A engagement by steric hindrance. To define the interplay between the carbohydrate receptor and antibody binding, we conducted hemagglutination inhibition assays using virions and ISVPs. The glycan-binding site of T1 σ1 is located in the head domain and is partly occluded by the bound Fab in the crystal structure. The T1-specific antibody inhibited hemagglutination by virions and ISVPs, probably via direct interference with glycan engagement. In contrast to T1 σ1, the carbohydrate-binding site of T3 σ1 is located in the tail domain, distal to the antibody epitope. The T3-specific antibody inhibited hemagglutination by T3 virions but not ISVPs, indicating that the antibody- and glycan-binding sites in σ1 are in closer spatial proximity on virions than on ISVPs. Our results provide direct evidence for a structural rearrangement of σ1 during virion-to-ISVP conversion and contribute new information about the mechanisms of antibody-mediated neutralization of reovirus.
Virus attachment proteins mediate binding to host cell receptors, serve critical functions in cell and tissue tropism, and are often targeted by the neutralizing antibody response. The structural investigation of antibody-antigen complexes can provide valuable information for understanding the molecular basis of virus neutralization. Studies with enveloped viruses, such as HIV and influenza virus, have helped to define sites of vulnerability and guide vaccination strategies. By comparison, less is known about antibody binding to nonenveloped viruses. Here, we structurally investigated two neutralizing antibodies that bind the attachment protein σ1 of reovirus. Furthermore, we characterized the neutralization efficiency, the binding affinity for σ1, and the effect of the antibodies on reovirus receptor engagement. Our analysis defines reovirus interactions with two neutralizing antibodies, allows us to propose a mechanism by which they block virus infection, and provides evidence for a conformational change in the σ1 protein during viral cell entry.
呼肠孤病毒附着蛋白σ1与聚糖受体和连接黏附分子A(JAM-A)结合,并且被认为在病毒粒子蛋白水解解离为伴随细胞进入的感染性子病毒颗粒(ISVP)的过程中会发生构象变化。σ1蛋白也是中和抗体的主要靶标。在此,我们展示了两种靶向1型(T1)和3型(T3)呼肠孤病毒σ1的中和抗体的结构和功能特征。晶体结构显示,每种抗体通过与JAM-A结合位点不同的表位在头部结构域内与同源σ1蛋白结合。表面等离子体共振和细胞结合试验表明,两种抗体可能通过空间位阻干扰JAM-A的结合。为了确定碳水化合物受体与抗体结合之间的相互作用,我们使用病毒粒子和ISVP进行了血凝抑制试验。T1 σ1的聚糖结合位点位于头部结构域,在晶体结构中部分被结合的Fab片段遮挡。T1特异性抗体抑制病毒粒子和ISVP的血凝,可能是通过直接干扰聚糖结合。与T1 σ1不同,T3 σ1的碳水化合物结合位点位于尾部结构域,远离抗体表位。T3特异性抗体抑制T3病毒粒子的血凝,但不抑制ISVP的血凝,表明σ1中抗体和聚糖结合位点在病毒粒子上的空间距离比在ISVP上更近。我们的结果为病毒粒子向ISVP转化过程中σ1的结构重排提供了直接证据,并为呼肠孤病毒抗体介导中和的机制提供了新信息。
病毒附着蛋白介导与宿主细胞受体的结合,在细胞和组织嗜性中发挥关键作用,并且常常是中和抗体反应的靶标。抗体-抗原复合物的结构研究可为理解病毒中和的分子基础提供有价值的信息。对包膜病毒(如HIV和流感病毒)的研究有助于确定易损位点并指导疫苗接种策略。相比之下,关于抗体与无包膜病毒的结合了解较少。在此,我们对两种结合呼肠孤病毒附着蛋白σ1的中和抗体进行了结构研究。此外,我们表征了中和效率、对σ1的结合亲和力以及抗体对呼肠孤病毒受体结合的影响。我们的分析确定了呼肠孤病毒与两种中和抗体的相互作用,使我们能够提出它们阻断病毒感染的机制,并为病毒细胞进入过程中σ1蛋白的构象变化提供了证据。