Laboratoire des Multimatériaux et Interfaces, UMR CNRS 5615, Université Lyon1, Villeurbanne, France; UFR Odontologie, Université Lyon1, Service de Consultations et de Traitements Dentaires, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Laboratoire des Multimatériaux et Interfaces, UMR CNRS 5615, Université Lyon1, Villeurbanne, France.
Dent Mater. 2017 Feb;33(2):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
Many new dental composites containing mesoporous silica fillers have been developed to improve rheological properties and enhance the resin-filler interface. To investigate the correlation between the cytocompatibility of several dental composites and their composition; two aspects have been considered: presence of bisphenol A (BPA)-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) or triethyleneglycol-dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) among the resin monomers and presence of porous particles among the filler blends.
Five commercial composites with different resin matrices and mineral fillers were compared to four experimental composites designed without any BPA-based monomers or TEGDMA. Porous fillers, with or without silanation, were added in some of the experimental composites. Two reference resin matrices were also selected. Cytocompatibility with cultured primary human gingival fibroblasts was assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy with time-lapse imaging. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to control monomer conversion rate.
Conversion rates of the experimental composites ranged from 57% to 71%, a comparable ratio for dental composites. Experimental samples were better tolerated than tested commercial samples not containing TEGDMA and significantly better than those containing TEGDMA. Experimental composites with porous fillers exhibited good cytocompatibility, especially when surfaces were silanated.
Cytotoxicity was associated with resin amount and especially resin nature. Composites containing porous fillers might behave as if the resin trapped into pores has no effect on toxicity. The cytotoxicity of composites with and without BPA derivatives was mainly attributed to the release of residual TEGDMA rather than the BPA derivatives.
为了改善流变性能和增强树脂-填料界面,已经开发出许多含有介孔硅填料的新型牙科复合材料。为了研究几种牙科复合材料的细胞相容性与其组成之间的相关性;考虑了两个方面:树脂单体中是否存在双酚 A(BPA)-甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯(Bis-GMA)或三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEGDMA)以及填料混合物中是否存在多孔颗粒。
将五种具有不同树脂基质和矿物填料的商业复合材料与四种不含任何基于 BPA 的单体或 TEGDMA 的实验复合材料进行比较。在一些实验复合材料中添加了具有或不具有硅烷化的多孔填料。还选择了两种参考树脂基质。通过共焦激光扫描显微镜进行延时成像来评估与培养的原代人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞相容性。傅里叶变换红外光谱用于控制单体转化率。
实验复合材料的转化率范围为 57%至 71%,这是牙科复合材料的可比比例。实验样品比不含 TEGDMA 的测试商业样品耐受性更好,比含有 TEGDMA 的样品明显更好。具有多孔填料的实验复合材料表现出良好的细胞相容性,尤其是当表面硅烷化时。
细胞毒性与树脂含量有关,尤其是树脂的性质。含有多孔填料的复合材料可能表现得好像被困在孔中的树脂对毒性没有影响。含有和不含有 BPA 衍生物的复合材料的细胞毒性主要归因于残留 TEGDMA 的释放,而不是 BPA 衍生物的释放。