• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视偏好测试:检测斜视患者弱视的可靠性及检查者间的一致性

Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement.

作者信息

Erkan Turan Kadriye, Taylan Sekeroglu Hande, Karahan Sevilay, Sanac Ali Sefik

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;37(6):1305-1310. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0403-4. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-016-0403-4
PMID:27933481
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability of the fixation preference test (FPT) in the detection of amblyopia, and to determine interexaminer agreement.

METHODS

Eighty patients whose visual acuity could be tested objectively and had a horizontal misalignment of more than 10 prism diopters were enrolled. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and orthoptic findings were all recorded. Non-preferred eye in primary position and fixation preference grade were assessed independently by two masked experienced examiners. The primary outcome measures were reliability of FPT in terms of its correlation with BCVA and interexaminer agreement.

RESULTS

There was no significant correlation between fixation preference grades and interocular visual acuity difference as well as the type and amount of deviation, the presence of fusion, stereopsis, anisometropia, and previous strabismus surgery for none of the examiners (p > 0.05 for all). Sensitivity was 52.0% for examiner 1 and 54.0% for examiner 2 while specificity was 50.0 and 46.7%, respectively. Interexaminer agreement was 76.7% (p < 0.001) for all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

FPT is widely used in children particularly when the visual acuity cannot be determined in an objective manner. The test may not be accurate and reliable in the detection of amblyopia and also in predicting the visual acuity difference between both eyes, even though it was found to show a high degree of agreement between examiners. In conclusion, it should be kept in mind that the reliability of FPT may be limited and the results should be interpreted with caution and be supported by other tests.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析注视偏好测试(FPT)在弱视检测中的可靠性,并确定检查者之间的一致性。

方法

纳入80例视力可客观检测且水平斜视度超过10棱镜度的患者。记录最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和斜视检查结果。由两名经验丰富的盲法检查者独立评估原在位非优势眼和注视偏好等级。主要观察指标为FPT与BCVA的相关性以及检查者之间的一致性方面的可靠性。

结果

对于所有检查者,注视偏好等级与双眼视力差异、斜视类型和度数、融合、立体视、屈光参差以及既往斜视手术之间均无显著相关性(所有p>0.05)。检查者1的敏感度为52.0%,检查者2的敏感度为54.0%,而特异度分别为50.0%和46.7%。所有患者的检查者间一致性为76.7%(p<0.001)。

结论

FPT广泛应用于儿童,尤其是在无法客观确定视力的情况下。该测试在弱视检测以及预测双眼视力差异方面可能并不准确可靠,尽管检查者之间显示出高度一致性。总之,应牢记FPT的可靠性可能有限,其结果应谨慎解释并需其他测试的支持。

相似文献

1
Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement.注视偏好测试:检测斜视患者弱视的可靠性及检查者间的一致性
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;37(6):1305-1310. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0403-4. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
2
The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia.双眼注视偏好对斜视性弱视诊断的准确性。
J AAPOS. 2010 Jun;14(3):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
3
Reliability and interexaminer agreement for induced tropia test: is normal always normal?诱导性斜视试验的可靠性和检查者间一致性:正常就永远正常吗?
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(3):615-618. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0312-6. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
4
Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors.基于人群的有弱视风险因素的学龄前儿童队列中的注视偏好和视力测试。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.031. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
5
The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus.用于评估斜视患者双眼视力差异的注视偏好测试分级的可靠性。
J AAPOS. 2002 Jun;6(3):191-4. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2002.122364.
6
Binocular fixation pattern and visual acuity in children with strabismic amblyopia.斜视性弱视儿童的双眼注视模式和视力
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000 Jan-Feb;37(1):24-8. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20000101-07.
7
False amblyopia prediction in strabismic patients by fixation preference testing correlates with contralateral ocular dominance.通过注视偏好测试对斜视患者进行的假性弱视预测与对侧眼优势相关。
J AAPOS. 2014 Oct;18(5):453-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
8
Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia.注视偏好测试与斜视性假性弱视之间的关联。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2007 May-Jun;44(3):174-7. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20070301-11.
9
The base-to-base induced-tropia prism test for detection of amblyopia: a pilot study.
J AAPOS. 2010 Dec;14(6):484-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.08.015.
10
Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?固视偏好是否是儿童黄斑功能的潜在指标?
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 29;51(3):151-155. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Fixation Preference a Potential Indicator of Macular Function in Children?固视偏好是否是儿童黄斑功能的潜在指标?
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 29;51(3):151-155. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.41524.
2
Factors influencing stereopsis in patients with both refractive accommodative esotropia and amblyopia.屈光性调节性内斜视合并弱视患者立体视的影响因素
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun;39(6):1263-1267. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0937-8. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of fixation preference for detecting amblyopia in strabismic patients.斜视患者中用于检测弱视的注视偏好的可靠性。
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2009 Jul;4(3):160-3.
2
Fixation preference tests for amblyopia: invaluable, useless, or somewhere in the middle?弱视的注视偏好测试:极有价值、毫无用处,还是介于两者之间?
J AAPOS. 2010 Jun;14(3):201-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.04.004.
3
The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia.双眼注视偏好对斜视性弱视诊断的准确性。
J AAPOS. 2010 Jun;14(3):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
4
Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors.基于人群的有弱视风险因素的学龄前儿童队列中的注视偏好和视力测试。
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.031. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
5
Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.学龄前儿童注视偏好与HOTV视标视力之间缺乏一致性:巴尔的摩儿童眼病研究
Ophthalmology. 2008 Oct;115(10):1796-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
6
Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia.注视偏好测试与斜视性假性弱视之间的关联。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2007 May-Jun;44(3):174-7. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20070301-11.
7
Amblyopia.弱视
Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1343-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4.
8
Diagnostic procedures in an orthoptic evaluation.斜视矫正评估中的诊断程序。
Am Orthopt J. 1962;12:63-9.
9
The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus.用于评估斜视患者双眼视力差异的注视偏好测试分级的可靠性。
J AAPOS. 2002 Jun;6(3):191-4. doi: 10.1067/mpa.2002.122364.
10
Binocular fixation pattern and visual acuity in children with strabismic amblyopia.斜视性弱视儿童的双眼注视模式和视力
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2000 Jan-Feb;37(1):24-8. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20000101-07.