Arnold-Forster Agnes
King's College London.
Br J Hist Sci. 2016 Dec;49(4):627-634. doi: 10.1017/S0007087416001175.
Despite its prominent position in today's medical research, popular culture and everyday life, cancer's history is relatively unwritten. Compared to the other great 'plagues' - cholera, tuberculosis or tropical fevers, to name but a scant handful - cancer has few dedicated pages in the general surveys, and its specialists have largely failed to convince the broader community of medical historians - or indeed historians of anything at all - that histories of the disease can tell us fundamental things about the science and practice of medicine, both past and present. Moreover, cancer has a remarkably stable profile over time, at least in terms of its definition, language and terminology - a detail that only makes the disease's absence from historical literature more surprising.
尽管癌症在当今医学研究、大众文化及日常生活中占据显著地位,但其历史却相对缺乏记载。与其他重大“瘟疫”相比——仅举寥寥几种,如霍乱、肺结核或热带热病——在综合概述中,关于癌症的专门篇幅很少,而且癌症专家在很大程度上未能让更广泛的医学史学家群体——甚至任何领域的历史学家——相信,该疾病的历史能告诉我们有关过去和现在医学科学与实践的基本情况。此外,癌症在很长一段时间内有着相当稳定的特征,至少在其定义、语言和术语方面是这样——这一细节只会让历史文献中缺少对该疾病的记载显得更加令人惊讶。