Ortner Catherine Nicole Marie, Ste Marie Mark, Corno Daniela
Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada.
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167253. eCollection 2016.
Recent models of emotion regulation suggest that the cognitive costs of reappraisal depend on stimulus intensity and habitual reappraisal. In the current experiment, we tested these hypotheses by manipulating the intensity of unpleasant and pleasant images, which participants reappraised, viewed, or suppressed their emotions to. To assess cognitive costs, we measured participants' performance on a concurrent simple reaction time task. Participants also reported on their everyday use of reappraisal and suppression. Higher intensity stimuli were associated with greater cognitive costs of reappraisal, for unpleasant, but not pleasant pictures. Also, greater habitual reappraisal predicted lower cognitive costs of reappraisal and greater reductions in subjective feelings. Results support the role of stimulus intensity and habitual use of reappraisal in predicting the cognitive costs of reappraisal.
近期的情绪调节模型表明,重新评价的认知成本取决于刺激强度和习惯性重新评价。在当前实验中,我们通过操纵不愉快和愉快图像的强度来检验这些假设,参与者对这些图像进行重新评价、观看或抑制自己的情绪。为了评估认知成本,我们测量了参与者在同时进行的简单反应时任务中的表现。参与者还报告了他们在日常生活中使用重新评价和抑制的情况。对于不愉快的图片,而非愉快的图片,更高强度的刺激与重新评价的更高认知成本相关。此外,更多的习惯性重新评价预示着重新评价的认知成本更低,以及主观感受的更大程度降低。结果支持了刺激强度和习惯性使用重新评价在预测重新评价的认知成本方面的作用。