• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪调节的认知基础:工作记忆更新能力调节反刍和重新评价对情绪的效果。

The cognitive building blocks of emotion regulation: ability to update working memory moderates the efficacy of rumination and reappraisal on emotion.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e69071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069071. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069071
PMID:23874872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3715480/
Abstract

The ability to regulate emotions is a critical component of healthy emotional functioning. Therefore, it is important to determine factors that contribute to the efficacy of emotion regulation. The present article examined whether the ability to update emotional information in working memory is a predictor of the efficacy of rumination and reappraisal on affective experience both at the trait level (Study 1) and in daily life (Study 2). In both studies, results revealed that the relationship between use of reappraisal and high arousal negative emotions was moderated by updating ability. Specifically, use of reappraisal was associated with decreased high arousal negative emotions for participants with high updating ability, while no significant relationship was found for those with low updating ability. In addition, both studies also revealed that the relationship between rumination and high arousal negative emotions was moderated by updating ability. In general, use of rumination was associated with elevated high arousal negative emotions. However, this relationship was blunted for participants with high updating ability. That is, use of rumination was associated with less elevated high arousal negative emotions for participants with high updating ability. These results identify the ability to update emotional information in working memory as a crucial process modulating the efficacy of emotion regulation efforts.

摘要

情绪调节能力是健康情绪功能的一个关键组成部分。因此,确定有助于情绪调节效果的因素非常重要。本文研究了在工作记忆中更新情绪信息的能力是否可以预测反思和重评对特质水平(研究 1)和日常生活(研究 2)中情绪体验的效果。在这两项研究中,结果都表明,重评的使用与高唤醒负性情绪之间的关系受到更新能力的调节。具体来说,对于更新能力高的参与者,使用重评与降低高唤醒负性情绪有关,而对于更新能力低的参与者,则没有发现显著的关系。此外,这两项研究还揭示了反思与高唤醒负性情绪之间的关系受到更新能力的调节。一般来说,反思的使用与高唤醒负性情绪有关。然而,对于更新能力高的参与者来说,这种关系变得不那么明显了。也就是说,对于更新能力高的参与者,使用反思与降低高唤醒负性情绪有关。这些结果表明,在工作记忆中更新情绪信息的能力是调节情绪调节效果的关键过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c6f/3715480/fac5d1025e88/pone.0069071.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c6f/3715480/46fe1c64ceda/pone.0069071.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c6f/3715480/fac5d1025e88/pone.0069071.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c6f/3715480/46fe1c64ceda/pone.0069071.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c6f/3715480/fac5d1025e88/pone.0069071.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The cognitive building blocks of emotion regulation: ability to update working memory moderates the efficacy of rumination and reappraisal on emotion.情绪调节的认知基础:工作记忆更新能力调节反刍和重新评价对情绪的效果。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 18;8(7):e69071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069071. Print 2013.
2
Association between working memory updating ability and cognitive reappraisal: An investigation into a modulatory role of the individual's sex.工作记忆更新能力与认知重评的关系:个体性别调节作用的研究。
Psych J. 2023 Apr;12(2):185-194. doi: 10.1002/pchj.628. Epub 2023 Jan 22.
3
Brooding moderates the link between reappraisal and inhibition of negative information.沉思调节了重新评价与抑制负面信息之间的联系。
Cogn Emot. 2015;29(5):923-34. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.955839. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
4
The effect of cognitive reappraisal on long-term emotional experience and emotional memory.认知重评对长期情绪体验和情绪记忆的影响。
J Neuropsychol. 2015 Mar;9(1):64-76. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12035. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
5
Individual differences in cognitive control processes and their relationship to emotion regulation.认知控制过程中的个体差异及其与情绪调节的关系。
Cogn Emot. 2016 Aug;30(5):912-24. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1032893. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
Increasing negative emotions by reappraisal enhances subsequent cognitive control: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.通过重新评价增加负性情绪会增强随后的认知控制:一项结合行为和电生理的研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 May;10(2):195-207. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.2.195.
7
High working memory load impairs the effect of cognitive reappraisal on emotional response: Evidence from an event-related potential study.高工作记忆负荷会削弱认知重评对情绪反应的影响:来自一项事件相关电位研究的证据。
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Feb 3;639:126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.12.069. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
8
Neural correlates of reappraisal considering working memory capacity and cognitive flexibility.考虑工作记忆容量和认知灵活性的再评价的神经相关物。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2018 Dec;12(6):1529-1543. doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9788-6.
9
Does emotion regulation engage the same neural circuit as working memory? A meta-analytical comparison between cognitive reappraisal of negative emotion and 2-back working memory task.情绪调节是否与工作记忆使用相同的神经回路?对负性情绪的认知重评与 2 -back 工作记忆任务的元分析比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203753. eCollection 2018.
10
Disentangling cognition and emotion in older adults: the role of cognitive control and mental health in emotional conflict adaptation.解析老年人的认知和情绪:认知控制和心理健康在情绪冲突适应中的作用。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;32(8):840-848. doi: 10.1002/gps.4535. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotion Regulation and Executive Functioning in Late Life.晚年的情绪调节与执行功能
Affect Sci. 2025 Jan 17;6(2):202-213. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00283-9. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Cognitive Dysfunction in the Addictions (CDiA): protocol for a neuron-to-neighbourhood collaborative research program.成瘾中的认知功能障碍(CDiA):一项从神经元到社区的合作研究计划方案
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 19;16:1455968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1455968. eCollection 2025.
3
The role of caregiver emotion regulation in youth mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking Rumination.重新思考沉思。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;3(5):400-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x.
2
A diffusion model account of the relationship between the emotional flanker task and rumination and depression.情绪启动任务与反刍和抑郁关系的扩散模型解释。
Emotion. 2013 Aug;13(4):739-47. doi: 10.1037/a0031628. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
3
Executive well-being: updating of positive stimuli in working memory is associated with subjective well-being.高管幸福感:工作记忆中积极刺激的更新与主观幸福感相关。
新冠疫情期间照顾者情绪调节对青少年心理健康的作用:一项纵向研究
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Oct 4:1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0954579424001081.
4
Cognitive control processes and emotion regulation in adolescence: Examining the impact of affective inhibition and heart-rate-variability on emotion regulation dynamics in daily life.青少年的认知控制过程和情绪调节:考察情感抑制和心率变异性对日常生活中情绪调节动态的影响。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Dec;70:101454. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101454. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
5
Cognitive Dysfunction in the Addictions (CDiA): A Neuron to Neighbourhood Collaborative Research Program on Executive Dysfunction and Functional Outcomes in Outpatients Seeking Treatment for Addiction.成瘾中的认知功能障碍(CDiA):一项关于执行功能障碍和寻求成瘾治疗的门诊患者功能结局的从神经元到社区的合作研究项目。
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 28:2024.08.30.24312806. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.30.24312806.
6
Integrating dynamic psychophysiological indices across time and contexts: Elucidating mechanisms, risk markers, and intervention targets.跨时间和情境整合动态心理生理指标:阐明机制、风险标志物和干预靶点。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Oct;61(10):e14630. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14630. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Impact of Childhood Maltreatment on Cognitive Function and Its Relationship With Emotion Regulation in Young Adults.童年期虐待对青年认知功能的影响及其与情绪调节的关系
J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 1;35(3):155-162. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.240001.
8
Depressive symptoms in early adolescence: the dynamic interplay between emotion regulation and affective flexibility.青春期早期的抑郁症状:情绪调节与情感灵活性之间的动态相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 22;15:1165995. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1165995. eCollection 2024.
9
The Reflective Mind of the Anxious in Action: Metacognitive Beliefs and Maladaptive Emotional Regulation Strategies Constrain Working Memory Efficiency.焦虑者行动中的反思性思维:元认知信念与适应不良的情绪调节策略制约工作记忆效率。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Feb 26;14(3):505-530. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14030034.
10
Trial protocol for the Building Resilience through Socio-Emotional Training (ReSET) programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a new transdiagnostic preventative intervention for adolescents.通过社会情感训练(ReSET)方案建立韧性的试验方案:一种新的针对青少年的跨诊断预防干预措施的集群随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Feb 23;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07931-2.
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
4
Interference resolution moderates the impact of rumination and reappraisal on affective experiences in daily life.干扰解决调节反刍和重新评价对日常生活中情感体验的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(3):492-501. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.719489. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
5
Depressive symptoms and cognitive control in a mixed antisaccade task: specific effects of depressive rumination.抑郁症状与混合反扫视任务中的认知控制:抑郁反刍的特定影响。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Aug;25(5):886-97. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.514711. Epub 2011 May 24.
6
Updating positive and negative stimuli in working memory in depression.在抑郁症中更新工作记忆中的正负刺激。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):654-64. doi: 10.1037/a0020283.
7
Cognitive rigidity in unipolar depression and obsessive compulsive disorder: examination of task switching, Stroop, working memory updating and post-conflict adaptation.单相抑郁和强迫症中的认知僵化:任务转换、Stroop、工作记忆更新和冲突后适应的研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Jan 30;185(1-2):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.04.044. Epub 2010 May 23.
8
The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.N 回任务作为工作记忆测量的同时效度。
Memory. 2010 May;18(4):394-412. doi: 10.1080/09658211003702171. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
9
Emotion regulation in depression: relation to cognitive inhibition.抑郁中的情绪调节:与认知抑制的关系。
Cogn Emot. 2010 Feb 1;24(2):281-98. doi: 10.1080/02699930903407948.
10
Cognition and depression: current status and future directions.认知与抑郁:现状与未来方向。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:285-312. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305.