Suppr超能文献

太阳能巴氏杀菌法与太阳能消毒法处理收集雨水的对比分析

Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater.

作者信息

Strauss André, Dobrowsky Penelope Heather, Ndlovu Thando, Reyneke Brandon, Khan Wesaal

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous pathogens and opportunistic pathogens have been detected in harvested rainwater. Developing countries, in particular, require time- and cost-effective treatment strategies to improve the quality of this water source. The primary aim of the current study was thus to compare solar pasteurization (SOPAS; 70 to 79 °C; 80 to 89 °C; and ≥90 °C) to solar disinfection (SODIS; 6 and 8 hrs) for their efficiency in reducing the level of microbial contamination in harvested rainwater. The chemical quality (anions and cations) of the SOPAS and SODIS treated and untreated rainwater samples were also monitored.

RESULTS

While the anion concentrations in all the samples were within drinking water guidelines, the concentrations of lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) exceeded the guidelines in all the SOPAS samples. Additionally, the iron (Fe) concentrations in both the SODIS 6 and 8 hr samples were above the drinking water guidelines. A >99% reduction in Escherichia coli and heterotrophic bacteria counts was then obtained in the SOPAS and SODIS samples. Ethidium monoazide bromide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (EMA-qPCR) analysis revealed a 94.70% reduction in viable Legionella copy numbers in the SOPAS samples, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 50.60% and 75.22% decrease, respectively. Similarly, a 99.61% reduction in viable Pseudomonas copy numbers was observed after SOPAS treatment, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 47.27% and 58.31% decrease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While both the SOPAS and SODIS systems reduced the indicator counts to below the detection limit, EMA-qPCR analysis indicated that SOPAS treatment yielded a 2- and 3-log reduction in viable Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively. Additionally, SODIS after 8 hrs yielded a 2-log and 1-log reduction in Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively and could be considered as an alternative, cost-effective treatment method for harvested rainwater.

摘要

背景

在收集的雨水中已检测到多种病原体和机会性病原体。特别是发展中国家,需要具有时效性和成本效益的处理策略来提高这种水源的质量。因此,本研究的主要目的是比较太阳能巴氏杀菌法(SOPAS;70至79°C;80至89°C;≥90°C)和太阳能消毒法(SODIS;6小时和8小时)在降低收集雨水中微生物污染水平方面的效率。还监测了经SOPAS和SODIS处理及未处理的雨水样品的化学质量(阴离子和阳离子)。

结果

虽然所有样品中的阴离子浓度均在饮用水标准范围内,但所有SOPAS样品中的铅(Pb)和镍(Ni)浓度均超过标准。此外,SODIS处理6小时和8小时的样品中的铁(Fe)浓度均高于饮用水标准。然后,SOPAS和SODIS样品中的大肠杆菌和异养细菌数量减少了99%以上。单叠氮化溴化乙锭定量聚合酶链反应(EMA-qPCR)分析显示,SOPAS样品中存活的军团菌拷贝数减少了94.70%,而SODIS处理6小时和8小时后,存活的军团菌拷贝数分别减少了50.60%和75.22%。同样,SOPAS处理后存活的假单胞菌拷贝数减少了99.61%,而SODIS处理6小时和8小时后,存活的假单胞菌拷贝数分别减少了47.27%和58.31%。

结论

虽然SOPAS和SODIS系统均将指示菌数量降低至检测限以下,但EMA-qPCR分析表明,SOPAS处理使存活的军团菌和假单胞菌拷贝数分别减少了2个对数和3个对数。此外,SODIS处理8小时后,军团菌和假单胞菌拷贝数分别减少了2个对数和1个对数,可被视为一种替代的、具有成本效益的收集雨水处理方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17d3/5148859/219f96670c9b/12866_2016_909_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验