Botelho Michael G, Dyson John E, Mui Thomas H F, Lam Walter Y H
Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Dent. 2017 Feb;57:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
Two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures (RBFPDs) have higher retention rates over longer span fixed-fixed RBFPDs. It has been hypothesized that interabutment stresses associated with fixed-fixed designs cause prosthesis debonds therefore for the replacement of molar-sized and longer spans, non-rigid connectors have been used to allow independent movement between two abutment teeth.
This preliminary study evaluates the clinical longevity and subjects' satisfaction of three-unit fixed-movable (FM3) RBFPDs provided at a dental teaching hospital.
Subjects who had received FM3 RBFPD(s) in the posterior region were clinically reviewed for complications. History of any debonds and subjects' satisfaction to the prosthesis was recorded. Time-to-debond (retention rate) and time-to-loss (survival rate) of these prostheses were presented in life tables.
Ninety-eight prostheses in 84 subjects were examined. Their mean service life was 31.8 months (SD 11.5, range 3-67 months). Twenty-two prostheses had a history of debond, resulting in a retention proportion of 77.6%; seventeen of these were rebonded and still present at the time of review. One prosthesis was lost after extraction of a periodontally-involved abutment tooth, giving a survival proportion of 93.9%. High subject satisfaction and no adverse outcome were reported.
Three-unit fixed-movable RBFPDs have a shorter success than two-unit cantilevered RBFPDs. However, non-rigid connectors allow the possibility of rebonding giving satisfactory short-term survival rate. Further research is needed to investigate their long-term efficacy.
Three-unit fixed-movable RBFPDs incorporating non-rigid connectors may be a feasible option for replacement of molar-size pontic in the posterior region.
两单位悬臂式树脂粘结固定局部义齿(RBFPD)在较长跨度的固定-固定RBFPD中具有更高的固位率。据推测,与固定-固定设计相关的基牙间应力会导致修复体脱粘,因此对于磨牙大小和更长跨度的修复,已使用非刚性连接体来允许两个基牙之间独立移动。
本初步研究评估了一家牙科教学医院提供的三单位固定-活动(FM3)RBFPD的临床使用寿命和患者满意度。
对在后部区域接受FM3 RBFPD的患者进行临床并发症复查。记录任何脱粘的病史以及患者对修复体的满意度。这些修复体的脱粘时间(固位率)和失用时间(生存率)以生命表的形式呈现。
检查了84名患者的98个修复体。它们的平均使用寿命为31.8个月(标准差11.5,范围3 - 67个月)。22个修复体有脱粘史,固位比例为77.6%;其中17个重新粘结,在复查时仍然存在。一颗修复体在拔除牙周受累的基牙后丢失,生存率为93.9%。报告了较高的患者满意度且无不良后果。
三单位固定-活动RBFPD的成功率低于两单位悬臂式RBFPD。然而,非刚性连接体允许重新粘结,短期生存率令人满意。需要进一步研究以调查其长期疗效。
包含非刚性连接体的三单位固定-活动RBFPD可能是后牙区磨牙大小桥体修复的可行选择。