• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接作用抗病毒药物联合治疗老年慢性丙型肝炎患者:成本效益分析。

Direct-acting antivirals combination for elderly patients with chronic hepatitis C: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery, Center for Digestive Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Liver Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):982-994. doi: 10.1111/liv.13339. Epub 2017 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1111/liv.13339
PMID:27943549
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) has been undertreated among elderly patients. Interferon-free treatment represents an opportunity for these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of directly acting antivirals (DAAs) in CHC elderly patients.

METHODS

A Markov model of CHC natural history was built. This study focuses on CHC patients older than 65 years, stratified according to genotype (1/4, 2 and 3), liver fibrosis (METAVIR F1 to F4), age and frailty phenotype (robust, pre-frail and frail). DAAs combination vs no treatment was simulated for each theoretical population, assessing life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in a lifetime time horizon and by the Healthcare System perspective.

RESULTS

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio increased with age and frailty status in all fibrosis stages. For robust F3 and F4 patients ICERs remained below the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of 40 000€/QALY up to age 75 and 86 years, respectively, depending on drug price and sustained virological response probability (sensitivity analysis). Notably, in F4 and frail subjects older than 75 years, ICER was more sensitive to non-liver-related mortality rate. In elderly F1 and F2 patients, ICERs were below WTP only up to 77 years old, with wide variability among frailty phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost-effectiveness of DAAs treatment of elderly CHC patients is solid in those with advanced fibrosis, but it depends strongly on frailty status and age, particularly in patients with milder fibrosis stages. Accurate assessment of clinical variables, including frailty, is necessary to allocate limited resources to this special population.

摘要

背景

慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)在老年患者中治疗不足。无干扰素治疗为这些患者提供了机会。本研究旨在评估直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)在 CHC 老年患者中的成本效益。

方法

建立了 CHC 自然史的 Markov 模型。本研究主要关注年龄大于 65 岁的 CHC 患者,根据基因型(1/4、2 和 3)、肝纤维化(METAVIR F1 至 F4)、年龄和虚弱表型(健壮、虚弱前期和虚弱)进行分层。为每个理论人群模拟了 DAA 联合治疗与无治疗,评估了每个理论人群的寿命、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、成本、终生时间范围内的增量成本效益比(ICER)以及从医疗保健系统角度的增量成本效益比。

结果

在所有纤维化阶段,随着年龄和虚弱状态的增加,增量成本效益比也随之增加。对于健壮的 F3 和 F4 患者,在药物价格和持续病毒学应答率(sVR)的影响下,ICER 仍低于 40000 欧元/QALY 的意愿支付阈值(WTP),直到分别 75 岁和 86 岁。值得注意的是,在 F4 和 75 岁以上的虚弱患者中,ICER 对非肝脏相关死亡率更为敏感。在年龄较大的 F1 和 F2 患者中,ICER 仅在 77 岁以下低于 WTP,且不同虚弱表型之间存在较大差异。

结论

在晚期纤维化的老年 CHC 患者中,DAA 治疗的成本效益是可靠的,但强烈依赖于虚弱状态和年龄,尤其是在纤维化程度较轻的患者中。准确评估包括虚弱在内的临床变量对于将有限资源分配给这一特殊人群至关重要。

相似文献

1
Direct-acting antivirals combination for elderly patients with chronic hepatitis C: A cost-effectiveness analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物联合治疗老年慢性丙型肝炎患者:成本效益分析。
Liver Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):982-994. doi: 10.1111/liv.13339. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of therapeutic options for chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infected patients.丙型肝炎病毒3型感染慢性患者治疗方案的成本效益分析
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;11(1):85-93. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2016.1222271. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
3
Economic Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Extension to Early-Stage Fibrosis Patients: Evidence from the PITER Real-World Cohort.《从 PITER 真实世界队列研究看将丙型肝炎病毒治疗扩展至早期纤维化患者的经济学评价》。
Value Health. 2018 Jul;21(7):783-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Cost-effectiveness of Early Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 by Stage of Liver Fibrosis in a US Treatment-Naive Population.美国初治人群中按肝纤维化阶段对丙型肝炎病毒1型进行早期治疗的成本效益
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):65-73. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6011.
5
Should we await IFN-free regimens to treat HCV genotype 1 treatment-naive patients? A cost-effectiveness analysis (ANRS 95141).我们是否应该等待无干扰素方案来治疗 HCV 基因型 1 初治患者?一项成本效益分析(ANRS 95141)。
J Hepatol. 2014 Jul;61(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
6
Early Treatment in HCV: Is it a Cost-Utility Option from the Italian Perspective?丙型肝炎病毒的早期治疗:从意大利的角度来看,这是一个具有成本效益的选择吗?
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Aug;36(8):661-72. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0414-y.
7
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of sofosbuvir, peginterferon and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Early treatment in the initial stage of fibrosis vs. delayed treatment in advanced fibrosis].索磷布韦、聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析:纤维化初期的早期治疗与晚期纤维化的延迟治疗对比
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Aug-Sep;39(7):449-57. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of elbasvir-grazoprevir regimen for treating hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection in stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease patients in France.法国 4-5 期慢性肾脏病患者丙型肝炎病毒 1 型感染治疗中艾尔巴韦格拉瑞韦方案的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194329. eCollection 2018.
9
Cost-effectiveness of a "treat-all" strategy using Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs) for Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 at different fibrosis stages.直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)“治疗所有”策略对不同纤维化分期的日本慢性丙型肝炎基因 1 型患者的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0248748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248748. eCollection 2021.
10
Cost-effectiveness of strategy-based approach to treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C.基于策略的方法治疗1型慢性丙型肝炎的成本效益
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;31(9):1628-37. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13341.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the Elderly in the Era of Direct-Acting Antivirals: Evidence from Clinical Trials and Real Life.直接作用抗病毒药物时代老年人的丙型肝炎病毒感染:来自临床试验和真实世界的证据
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Nov 18;8(11):502. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8110502.
2
Safety and efficacy of directly-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus in elderly people.直接作用抗病毒疗法治疗老年人慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的安全性和有效性
Aging Med (Milton). 2021 Dec 21;4(4):304-316. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12190. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Direct-acting antiviral treatment for Hepatitis C Virus in geriatric patients: a real-world retrospective comparison between early and late elderly patients.
老年患者丙型肝炎病毒的直接抗病毒治疗:老年早期和晚期患者的真实世界回顾性比较
PeerJ. 2021 Mar 16;9:e10944. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10944. eCollection 2021.
4
Anticholinergic Burden and Safety Outcomes in Older Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: A Retrospective Cohort Study.抗胆碱能负担与老年慢性丙型肝炎患者的安全结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3776. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113776.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.卡培他滨联合贝伐珠单抗对比卡培他滨单药治疗中国社会视角下未经治疗的转移性结直肠癌老年患者的成本效果分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2020 Jan;22(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s12094-019-02114-x. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Elbasvir/Grazoprevir in Hepatitis C Virus GT1- and GT4-Infected People Aged 65 Years or Older.艾尔巴韦/格拉瑞韦治疗65岁及以上丙型肝炎病毒GT1和GT4感染患者的疗效与安全性
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2019 Jan 22;5:2333721418817398. doi: 10.1177/2333721418817398. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
7
Population Health and Cost-Effectiveness Implications of a "Treat All" Recommendation for HCV: A Review of the Model-Based Evidence.丙型肝炎病毒“全面治疗”建议对人群健康和成本效益的影响:基于模型证据的综述
MDM Policy Pract. 2018 May 24;3(1):2381468318776634. doi: 10.1177/2381468318776634. eCollection 2018 Jan-Jun.
8
Evaluation of health status in patients with hepatitis c treated with and without interferon.评估使用和不使用干扰素治疗丙型肝炎患者的健康状况。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jan 17;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0842-x.