Karasaki Takahiro, Nagayama Kazuhiro, Kuwano Hideki, Nitadori Jun-Ichi, Sato Masaaki, Anraku Masaki, Hosoi Akihiro, Matsushita Hirokazu, Takazawa Masaki, Ohara Osamu, Nakajima Jun, Kakimi Kazuhiro
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Immunotherapeutics, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Cancer Sci. 2017 Feb;108(2):170-177. doi: 10.1111/cas.13131. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
The importance of neoantigens for cancer immunity is now well-acknowledged. However, there are diverse strategies for predicting and prioritizing candidate neoantigens, and thus reported neoantigen loads vary a great deal. To clarify this issue, we compared the numbers of neoantigen candidates predicted by four currently utilized strategies. Whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) of four non-small-cell lung cancer patients was carried out. We identified 361 somatic missense mutations from which 224 candidate neoantigens were predicted using MHC class I binding affinity prediction software (strategy I). Of these, 207 exceeded the set threshold of gene expression (fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped ≥1), resulting in 124 candidate neoantigens (strategy II). To verify mutant mRNA expression, sequencing of amplicons from tumor cDNA including each mutation was undertaken; 204 of the 207 mutations were successfully sequenced, yielding 121 mutant mRNA sequences, resulting in 75 candidate neoantigens (strategy III). Sequence information was extracted from RNA-Seq to confirm the presence of mutated mRNA. Variant allele frequencies ≥0.04 in RNA-Seq were found for 117 of the 207 mutations and regarded as expressed in the tumor, and finally, 72 candidate neoantigens were predicted (strategy IV). Without additional amplicon sequencing of cDNA, strategy IV was comparable to strategy III. We therefore propose strategy IV as a practical and appropriate strategy to predict candidate neoantigens fully utilizing currently available information. It is of note that different neoantigen loads were deduced from the same tumors depending on the strategies applied.
新抗原在癌症免疫中的重要性现已得到广泛认可。然而,预测和筛选候选新抗原的策略多种多样,因此报道的新抗原负荷差异很大。为了阐明这个问题,我们比较了目前使用的四种策略预测的新抗原候选物数量。对四名非小细胞肺癌患者进行了全外显子组测序和RNA测序(RNA-Seq)。我们鉴定出361个体细胞错义突变,使用MHC I类结合亲和力预测软件(策略I)从中预测出224个候选新抗原。其中,207个超过了基因表达的设定阈值(每百万映射片段中转录本每千碱基的片段数≥1),产生了124个候选新抗原(策略II)。为了验证突变mRNA的表达,对包括每个突变的肿瘤cDNA扩增子进行了测序;207个突变中的204个成功测序,产生了121个突变mRNA序列,产生了75个候选新抗原(策略III)。从RNA-Seq中提取序列信息以确认突变mRNA的存在。在207个突变中的117个中发现RNA-Seq中的变异等位基因频率≥0.04,并被视为在肿瘤中表达,最终预测出72个候选新抗原(策略IV)。在不进行cDNA额外扩增子测序的情况下,策略IV与策略III相当。因此,我们提出策略IV是一种充分利用现有信息预测候选新抗原的实用且合适的策略。值得注意的是,根据所应用的策略,从相同肿瘤中推断出了不同的新抗原负荷。