Kitahara Y, Takamoto M, Maruyama M, Tanaka Y, Ishibashi T, Shinoda A
Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Jun;27(6):689-95.
We measured the computed tomography (CT) index, LL%w, in 81 patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. In this study we defined LL%w as the mean value of the proportion of the low density area under -950 Hounsfield units in the six lung fields: upper, middle and lower lung fields bilaterally, at deep expiration. In order to examine the usefulness of LL%w in differentiating pulmonary emphysema (PE) from bronchial asthma (BA) and chronic bronchitis (CB), we excluded the overlapped cases of each diseases. Mean value (+/- standard deviation) of LL%w in PE was 24.6 +/- 20.2% (n = 40), whereas it was 0.5 +/- 0.8% (n = 27) in BA and 0.2 +/- 0.3% (n = 14) in CB respectively. There were clear statistically differences in the values of LL%w between clinically diagnosed emphysema and others. In this quantitative study we considered that the value of LL%w within 1% would be observed nonspecifically, because the frequent existence of low density areas originated in bronchial tangents and/or motion artifacts mainly in the left lower lung field. Thus we judged that cases with over 1% of LL%w had abnormal CT findings. The relationship between clinically diagnosed emphysema and CT abnormality (LL%w greater than 1%) was significant in the analysis of the four-fold table; The CT sensitivity for diagnosing PE was 100%, the CT specificity was 87.8%, and CT accuracy was 93.8%. When cases of LL%w greater than 1% were shown in BA or CB, it would be better to consider the existence of complicated emphysema or the presence of air trapping or air spaces of any origin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们对81例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘患者进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)指数LL%w的测量。在本研究中,我们将LL%w定义为深呼气时双侧上、中、下六个肺野中低于-950亨氏单位的低密度区域比例的平均值。为了研究LL%w在区分肺气肿(PE)与支气管哮喘(BA)和慢性支气管炎(CB)方面的效用,我们排除了每种疾病的重叠病例。PE组LL%w的平均值(±标准差)为24.6±20.2%(n = 40),而BA组为0.5±0.8%(n = 27),CB组为0.2±0.3%(n = 14)。临床诊断的肺气肿与其他疾病的LL%w值存在明显的统计学差异。在这项定量研究中,我们认为LL%w在1%以内的值可能是非特异性的,因为低密度区域的频繁出现主要源于左下肺野的支气管切线和/或运动伪影。因此,我们判断LL%w超过1%的病例有异常CT表现。在四格表分析中,临床诊断的肺气肿与CT异常(LL%w大于1%)之间的关系具有显著性;诊断PE的CT敏感性为100%,CT特异性为87.8%,CT准确性为93.8%。当BA或CB出现LL%w大于1%的病例时,最好考虑是否存在合并肺气肿或是否存在任何原因引起的气体潴留或气腔。(摘要截断于250字)