Kulkarni Gayithri H, Jadhav Prashant, Kulkarni Kiran, Shinde Sachin V, Patil Yojana B, Kumar Manish
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tatyasaheb Kore Dental College and Research Centre, Kolhapur, Maharashtra India.
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India, Phone: +919023956789 e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):934-938. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1957.
Dental implants form the mainstay of dental treatment involving rehabilitation of missing teeth. One of the major concerns for the clinicians doing dental implants is the postsurgical failure of dental implants. Success of dental implants is dependent upon the skills of the surgeon and the amount and quality of the bone remaining at the edentulous area where dental implant has to be placed. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nitrites are few of the enzymes and molecules which are said to be altered in inflammation. However, their exact role in the inflammatory processes around natural tooth and dental implant is still unclear. Hence we comparatively evaluated the levels of MPO and nitrites in the areas around the dental implants and natural teeth.
The present study comprises 42 patients who underwent prosthetic rehabilitation by dental implants from 2011 to 2014. Depth of probing value (DP), score of plaque index (SPI), gingival index (GI), and index of gingival bleeding time (GBT) were evaluated for the assessment of the periimplant soft tissue changes. Assessment of inflammation around the dental implant surface and around natural tooth was done based on the readings of these parameters. For the measurement of the MPO levels, spectrophotometric MPO assay was used. All the results were analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.
The mean plaque index values were 1.56 and 0.97 in periodontitis cases of natural teeth and inflamed cases of dental implants respectively. While comparing mean plaque index, mean probing depth, and mean gingival bleeding index in between the two groups, significant difference was obtained. Mean MPO concentration in periodontitis and gingivitis cases in natural teeth were 0.683 and 0.875 U/μL, while in inflamed dental implant cases, the mean value was 0.622 U/μL. While comparing the total MPO levels, total nitrite levels, and total nitrite concentration in between two study groups, significant difference was obtained. On comparing the healthy and periodontitis cases in natural teeth, significant difference was obtained.
In the inflammatory processes occurring around dental implant and natural teeth, MPO and NO make some amount of significant contribution.
The present study enforces on the role of MPO and nitrite as diagnostic and prognostic marker.
牙种植体是涉及缺失牙修复的牙科治疗的主要手段。进行牙种植的临床医生主要关注的问题之一是牙种植体的术后失败。牙种植体的成功取决于外科医生的技术以及必须植入牙种植体的无牙区剩余骨量和质量。髓过氧化物酶(MPO)和亚硝酸盐是少数据说在炎症中会发生变化的酶和分子。然而,它们在天然牙和牙种植体周围炎症过程中的确切作用仍不清楚。因此,我们比较评估了牙种植体和天然牙周围区域中MPO和亚硝酸盐的水平。
本研究包括2011年至2014年接受牙种植体修复治疗的42例患者。评估探诊深度值(DP)、菌斑指数评分(SPI)、牙龈指数(GI)和牙龈出血时间指数(GBT),以评估种植体周围软组织变化。根据这些参数的读数评估牙种植体表面和天然牙周围的炎症情况。使用分光光度法MPO测定法测量MPO水平。所有结果均采用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行分析。
天然牙牙周炎病例和牙种植体炎症病例的平均菌斑指数值分别为1.56和0.97。比较两组之间的平均菌斑指数、平均探诊深度和平均牙龈出血指数时,获得了显著差异。天然牙牙周炎和牙龈炎病例的平均MPO浓度分别为0.683和0.875 U/μL,而牙种植体炎症病例的平均值为0.622 U/μL。比较两个研究组之间的总MPO水平、总亚硝酸盐水平和总亚硝酸盐浓度时,获得了显著差异。比较天然牙的健康病例和牙周炎病例时,获得了显著差异。
在牙种植体和天然牙周围发生的炎症过程中,MPO和NO做出了一定程度的显著贡献。
本研究强调了MPO和亚硝酸盐作为诊断和预后标志物的作用。