Piaggesi A, Sambataro M, Nicoletti C, Goretti C, Lacopi E, Coppelli A
Diabetic Foot Section, Department of Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Metabolism Disease and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Santa Maria di Ca' Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
J Wound Care. 2016 Dec 2;25(12):704-711. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.12.704.
To test the efficacy and safety of therapeutic magnetic resonance (TMR) in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), the authors designed a prospective randomised controlled trial in three highly specialised diabetic foot clinics.
All the patients consecutively visited in a period of 18 months were screened according to the inclusion (presence of an ulcer >1 cm in the foot lasting at least 6 weeks; ABPI>0.6; consent to participate in the study) and exclusion (Charcot's foot; local or systemic infections; chronic renal failure; any wearable electrically-driven life-supporting device) criteria. Patients, who were treated according to international guideline protocols, were randomised into two groups: group A received for four weeks the sham application of TMR, while group B received the active TMR for the same period. People were followed-up to 10 weeks and healing rate (HR), healing time (HT), rate of granulation tissue on wound bed (% GT), reduction of the area of the lesion (∆AL) and a score (0-3) evaluating erythema, oedema, pain and tenderness, respectively, were measured. Adverse events (AE) were registered and monitored throughout the study.
No differences were observed in HR, HT and ∆AL between the two groups during follow-up, while % GT and the scores for erythema, oedema and pain at 10 weeks showed significant (p<0.05) improvements in group B compared with group A and versus baseline. When restricted to non-ischaemic patients (ABPI>0.8), ∆AL was significantly (p<0.05) more pronounced in group B than in group A. No difference in AE occurrence was observed between the two groups.
Our study, despite not being able to demonstrate the effectiveness of TMR on healing rate at 10 weeks, with 4 weeks of active treatment in neuro-ischaemic DFUs, shows positive effects on clinical aspects of the DFU and is associated with a significant increase of GT in the wound bed.
The study has been fully sponsored by Thereson S.p.A., manufacturer of TMR devices.
为了测试治疗性磁共振(TMR)在治疗糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)中的疗效和安全性,作者在三家高度专业化的糖尿病足诊所设计了一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
对在18个月期间连续就诊的所有患者,根据纳入标准(足部存在直径>1 cm的溃疡且持续至少6周;踝肱指数>0.6;同意参与研究)和排除标准(夏科氏足;局部或全身感染;慢性肾衰竭;任何可穿戴的电动生命支持设备)进行筛查。按照国际指南方案进行治疗的患者被随机分为两组:A组接受为期四周的TMR假治疗,而B组在同一时期接受活性TMR治疗。对患者随访至10周,并测量愈合率(HR)、愈合时间(HT)、伤口床肉芽组织率(%GT)、病变面积减少量(∆AL)以及分别评估红斑、水肿、疼痛和压痛的评分(0 - 3分)。在整个研究过程中记录并监测不良事件(AE)。
随访期间两组在HR、HT和∆AL方面未观察到差异,而B组在10周时的%GT以及红斑、水肿和疼痛评分与A组相比以及与基线相比均有显著(p<0.05)改善。当仅限于非缺血性患者(踝肱指数>0.8)时,B组的∆AL明显(p<0.05)大于A组。两组在不良事件发生方面未观察到差异。
我们的研究尽管未能证明TMR在10周愈合率上的有效性,但对于神经缺血性糖尿病足溃疡进行4周的积极治疗,显示出对糖尿病足溃疡临床方面的积极影响,并且与伤口床肉芽组织的显著增加相关。
该研究由TMR设备制造商Thereson S.p.A.全额赞助。