Moore T H M, Kapur N, Hawton K, Richards A, Metcalfe C, Gunnell D
School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol,Bristol,UK.
Centre for Suicide Prevention, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester,Manchester,UK.
Psychol Med. 2017 Apr;47(6):1062-1084. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002944. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
Job loss, debt and financial difficulties are associated with increased risk of mental illness and suicide in the general population. Interventions targeting people in debt or unemployed might help reduce these effects.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (January 2016) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions to reduce the effects of unemployment and debt on mental health in general population samples. We assessed papers for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias.
Eleven RCTs (n = 5303 participants) met the inclusion criteria. All recruited participants were unemployed. Five RCTs assessed 'job-club' interventions, two cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and a single RCT assessed each of emotional competency training, expressive writing, guided imagery and debt advice. All studies were at high risk of bias. 'Job club' interventions led to improvements in levels of depression up to 2 years post-intervention; effects were strongest among those at increased risk of depression (improvements of up to 0.2-0.3 s.d. in depression scores). There was mixed evidence for effectiveness of group CBT on symptoms of depression. An RCT of debt advice found no effect but had poor uptake. Single trials of three other interventions showed no evidence of benefit.
'Job-club' interventions may be effective in reducing depressive symptoms in unemployed people, particularly those at high risk of depression. Evidence for CBT-type interventions is mixed; further trials are needed. However the studies are old and at high risk of bias. Future intervention studies should follow CONSORT guidelines and address issues of poor uptake.
失业、债务和经济困难与普通人群中精神疾病和自杀风险的增加有关。针对负债或失业人群的干预措施可能有助于减轻这些影响。
我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和PsycINFO(2016年1月),以查找关于干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT),这些干预措施旨在减轻失业和债务对普通人群心理健康的影响。我们评估论文是否纳入,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。
11项RCT(n = 5303名参与者)符合纳入标准。所有招募的参与者均为失业者。5项RCT评估了“就业俱乐部”干预措施,2项评估了认知行为疗法(CBT),单项RCT分别评估了情绪能力训练、表达性写作、引导式意象和债务咨询。所有研究都存在较高的偏倚风险。“就业俱乐部”干预措施在干预后长达2年的时间里使抑郁水平有所改善;在抑郁风险增加的人群中效果最为明显(抑郁评分改善高达0.2 - 0.3标准差)。关于团体CBT对抑郁症状有效性的证据不一。一项债务咨询的RCT未发现效果,但接受度较低。其他三项干预措施的单项试验未显示出有益效果。
“就业俱乐部”干预措施可能有效减轻失业者的抑郁症状,尤其是那些抑郁风险较高的人。CBT类干预措施的证据不一;需要进一步试验。然而,这些研究年代久远且偏倚风险较高。未来的干预研究应遵循CONSORT指南并解决接受度低的问题。