• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术:增加延迟手术的价值。

The Nipple-Areola Preserving Mastectomy: The Value of Adding a Delay Procedure.

作者信息

Martinez Carlos A, Reis Scott M, Boutros Sean G

机构信息

Houston Plastic Craniofacial & Sinus Surgery, Houston, Tex.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Nov 23;4(11):e1098. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001098. eCollection 2016 Nov.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001098
PMID:27975014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5142480/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conservative mastectomy procedures, such as the nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), present appealing options for patients with small invasive or noninvasive malignancies and those needing prophylactic mastectomies. Despite outstanding postoperative cosmetic results, nipple-areola complex (NAC) and mastectomy skin flap (MSF) survival remains a concern. We present our two-stage nipple-areola preserving (NAP) mastectomy, which aims to decrease the rate of NAC loss and MSF necrosis after conservative mastectomies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy patients who underwent NSM because of malignant and benign conditions were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent our two-stage NAP mastectomy were matched to the group of mastectomy patients without preservation techniques. Demographic data and postoperative results were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

The NAP group comprised 45 flaps (24 patients), and the NSM group comprised 75 flaps (46 patients). None were actively smoking. The mean time between the delay of the flap and breast reconstruction was 17.6 days (range, of 10-35 days) in the NAP group. No signs of NAC vascular compromise were observed in the NAP group. Nipple necrosis rates were significantly greater ( = 0.0136) in the NSM group: 9 cases in the NSM group versus none within the NAP group. Two patients within the NAP group required nipple excision at the time of their mastectomies after biopsies performed at the time of the NAC delay were positive for malignancy or atypia.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular delay techniques favor the blood supply of a tissue after a surgical wound, effectively improving the survival of the NAC and MSF after nipple-sparing mastectomies.

摘要

背景

保守性乳房切除术,如保留乳头的乳房切除术(NSM),为患有小的浸润性或非浸润性恶性肿瘤的患者以及需要进行预防性乳房切除术的患者提供了有吸引力的选择。尽管术后美容效果出色,但乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)和乳房切除皮瓣(MSF)的存活仍然是一个问题。我们提出了我们的两阶段保留乳头乳晕(NAP)乳房切除术,旨在降低保守性乳房切除术后NAC丧失和MSF坏死的发生率。

材料与方法

70例因恶性和良性疾病接受NSM的患者分为2组:接受我们两阶段NAP乳房切除术的患者与未采用保留技术的乳房切除术患者组相匹配。对人口统计学数据和术后结果进行回顾性评估。

结果

NAP组包括45个皮瓣(24例患者),NSM组包括75个皮瓣(46例患者)。均无主动吸烟情况。NAP组皮瓣延迟与乳房重建之间的平均时间为17.6天(范围为10 - 35天)。NAP组未观察到NAC血管受损的迹象。NSM组乳头坏死率显著更高(P = 0.0136):NSM组9例,NAP组无。NAP组有2例患者在NAC延迟时进行活检显示恶性或异型增生阳性后,在乳房切除时需要切除乳头。

结论

血管延迟技术有利于手术伤口后组织的血液供应,有效提高保留乳头乳房切除术后NAC和MSF的存活率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/f6aa96cddbaf/gox-4-e1098-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/86cd8549afa0/gox-4-e1098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/cb7db480db5f/gox-4-e1098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/f8ee00f5a12b/gox-4-e1098-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/f6aa96cddbaf/gox-4-e1098-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/86cd8549afa0/gox-4-e1098-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/cb7db480db5f/gox-4-e1098-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/f8ee00f5a12b/gox-4-e1098-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f61/5142480/f6aa96cddbaf/gox-4-e1098-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The Nipple-Areola Preserving Mastectomy: The Value of Adding a Delay Procedure.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术:增加延迟手术的价值。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Nov 23;4(11):e1098. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001098. eCollection 2016 Nov.
2
The Nipple-Areola Preserving Mastectomy: A Multistage Procedure Aiming to Improve Reconstructive Outcomes following Mastectomy.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术:一种旨在改善乳房切除术后重建效果的多阶段手术。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Oct 20;3(10):e538. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000516. eCollection 2015 Oct.
3
Comparative Study of Nipple-Areola Complex Position and Patient Satisfaction After Unilateral Mastectomy and Immediate Expander-Implant Reconstruction Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.单侧乳房切除术和即刻扩张器-植入物重建乳头保留乳房切除术与皮肤保留乳房切除术的乳头乳晕复合体位置比较研究及患者满意度。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;43(2):313-327. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1217-8. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.高乳腺癌风险人群双侧预防性乳房切除术后即刻植入式乳房重建的患者满意度及乳头乳晕敏感性:保留乳头乳房切除术与保留皮肤乳房切除术的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;77(2):145-52. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000366.
5
Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.保留乳头和皮肤的乳房切除术:目的、肿瘤安全性和禁忌证的综述。
Breast. 2017 Aug;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Delay techniques for nipple-sparing mastectomy: A systematic review.保留乳头的乳房切除术延迟技术:一项系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Feb;70(2):236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
7
Nipple-sparing mastectomy in association with intra operative radiotherapy (ELIOT): A new type of mastectomy for breast cancer treatment.保留乳头的乳房切除术联合术中放疗(ELIOT):一种用于乳腺癌治疗的新型乳房切除术。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Mar;96(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s10549-005-9033-7. Epub 2005 Oct 27.
8
Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature.保留乳头的乳房切除术:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心的初步经验及文献综述
Breast J. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):440-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00758.x. Epub 2009 May 22.
9
Defining a place for nipple sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence based review.定义保乳头乳房切除术在现代乳房护理中的地位:基于证据的综述。
Breast J. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):571-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01220.x. Epub 2012 Jan 29.
10
Nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy.保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳房切除术
Gland Surg. 2015 Dec;4(6):528-40. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.12.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing Perspectives in Mastectomy: The Case for Nipple Preservation.乳房切除术观念的转变:保留乳头的理由。
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Mar 1;94(3):263-268. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004239. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
2
Two-Stage Versus One-Stage Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Timing of Surgery Prevents Nipple Loss.两阶段与单阶段保留乳头的乳房切除术:手术时机可预防乳头丢失。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(10):5707-5715. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10456-6. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
3
The Hybrid Delay: A New Approach for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Macromastia.

本文引用的文献

1
The Nipple-Areola Preserving Mastectomy: A Multistage Procedure Aiming to Improve Reconstructive Outcomes following Mastectomy.保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术:一种旨在改善乳房切除术后重建效果的多阶段手术。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Oct 20;3(10):e538. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000516. eCollection 2015 Oct.
2
Safety of tissue expander/implant versus autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.组织扩张器/植入物与自体腹部组织在乳腺癌根治术后乳房重建中的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):234-249. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436847.94408.11.
3
混合延迟法:巨乳症保留乳头乳房切除术的新方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jun 23;8(6):e2940. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002940. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
The Influence of Patient Exposure to Breast Reconstruction Approaches and Education on Patient Choices in Breast Cancer Treatment.患者对乳房重建方法的接触和教育对乳腺癌治疗中患者选择的影响。
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Aug;83(2):206-210. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001661.
5
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.保乳乳头切除术治疗癌症的前瞻性队列试验:灌注、并发症和患者结局。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul;142(1):13-26. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004498.
6
Immediate breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy in an Asian population: Aesthetic outcomes and mitigating nipple-areolar complex necrosis.亚洲人群保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术后即刻乳房重建:美学效果及减轻乳头乳晕复合体坏死
Arch Plast Surg. 2018 May;45(3):229-238. doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.01067. Epub 2018 May 15.
Surgical delay of the nipple-areolar complex: a powerful technique to maximize nipple viability following nipple-sparing mastectomy.
乳头乳晕复合体的手术延迟:一种在保乳手术后最大限度提高乳头存活率的强大技术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3171-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2528-7. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
4
Conservative mastectomy: extending the idea of breast conservation.保留乳房的切除术:拓展保乳理念。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):e311-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70133-X. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
5
Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis?保留乳头的乳房切除术:我们能否预测导致坏死的因素?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;38(2):125-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.10.007. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
6
Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer.前瞻性评估保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳房切除术在降低风险和治疗早期乳腺癌方面的效果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1137-44. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2099-z. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
7
Quality of life after immediate breast reconstruction and skin-sparing mastectomy - a comparison with patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.即刻乳房重建和保留皮肤的乳房切除术患者的生活质量 - 与保乳手术患者的比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov;37(11):937-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.08.126. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
8
Skin/nipple sparing mastectomies and implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with large and ptotic breast: oncological and reconstructive results.保留皮肤/乳头的乳房切除术和基于植入物的乳房重建术在大而垂乳患者中的应用:肿瘤学和重建结果。
Breast. 2012 Jun;21(3):267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
9
Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years.99 例患者行保留乳头乳晕的乳房切除术,平均随访 5 年。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1665-70. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1475-4. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
10
Nipple-sparing mastectomy.保留乳头的乳房切除术。
Br J Surg. 2010 Mar;97(3):305-16. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6970.