• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在三维分析中,三维显示器比二维显示器更合适吗?

Are Three-Dimensional Monitors More Appropriate Than Two-Dimensional Monitors in the Three-Dimensional Analysis?

作者信息

Ahn Jaemyung, Hong Jongrak

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jan;28(1):e101-e104. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003288.

DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000003288
PMID:27977484
Abstract

In orthognathic surgery, three-dimensional (3D) program-based analysis of 3D reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) images is commonly used, and images viewed on a monitor. The authors compared the coordinates of facial landmarks on images in a 3D program displayed on a two-dimensional (2D) (standard) or 3D monitor. Facial bone CT data from 30 patients were reconstructed in 3D. Four researchers identified 33 facial landmarks, 3 times each on 2D and 3D monitors, for each patient, by their x-, y-, and z-coordinates. The time taken to complete these identifications was measured.For each set of coordinates, the average intraclass coefficient was >0.8 for 2D and 3D analyses, as well as among 4 readers. It took on average of 2 minutes 46 seconds to identify the landmarks on the 2D monitor, compared with 2 minutes 25 seconds on the 3D monitor. The variance of individual coordinates differed when measured on 2D or 3D monitor. The landmarks affected were located near the median region of the facial area, and are important for setting the reference sagittal plane during diagnosis for orthognathic surgery. Therefore, identifying facial landmarks using 3D monitors may be helpful for conducting accurate facial diagnoses.

摘要

在正颌外科手术中,通常使用基于三维(3D)程序对计算机断层扫描(CT)图像进行三维重建分析,并在显示器上查看图像。作者比较了在二维(2D)(标准)或三维显示器上显示的3D程序中的图像上面部标志点的坐标。对30例患者的面部骨CT数据进行了三维重建。四名研究人员为每位患者在2D和3D显示器上各识别33个面部标志点3次,记录其x、y和z坐标。测量完成这些识别所需的时间。对于每组坐标,2D和3D分析以及4名读者之间的平均组内相关系数均>0.8。在2D显示器上识别标志点平均用时2分46秒,而在3D显示器上为2分25秒。在2D或3D显示器上测量时,各个坐标的方差有所不同。受影响的标志点位于面部区域的中线附近,对于正颌外科手术诊断期间设置矢状面参考很重要。因此,使用3D显示器识别面部标志点可能有助于进行准确的面部诊断。

相似文献

1
Are Three-Dimensional Monitors More Appropriate Than Two-Dimensional Monitors in the Three-Dimensional Analysis?在三维分析中,三维显示器比二维显示器更合适吗?
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jan;28(1):e101-e104. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003288.
2
[Quantitative analysis of craniofacial skeleton asymmetry by three-dimensional computed tomography].[三维计算机断层扫描对颅面骨骼不对称的定量分析]
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;29(6):435-9.
3
[Quantitative analysis based on three-dimensional CT in the contouring surgery of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia].基于三维CT的颅面部骨纤维异常增殖症轮廓整形手术的定量分析
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 May;31(3):168-72.
4
The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery.正颌手术后三维面型变化与下颌运动的关系。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Oct;41(7):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
5
Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients.在骨性III类患者接受双颌旋转正颌手术后,使用三维相机进行面部软组织分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;42(3):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
6
Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.应用低剂量 CT 测量三维颅底后角度的可重复性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Nov;21(8):2407-2414. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2036-4. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
7
Intuitive Facial Imaging Method for Evaluation of Postoperative Swelling: A Combination of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Laser Surface Scanning in Orthognathic Surgery.用于评估术后肿胀的直观面部成像方法:正颌外科中三维计算机断层扫描与激光表面扫描的联合应用
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;74(12):2506.e1-2506.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
8
CT interpretation of craniofacial anomalies: a comparative analysis by undergraduate dental students.颅面畸形的CT解读:本科牙科学生的比较分析
Braz Oral Res. 2005 Jan-Mar;19(1):58-62. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242005000100011.
9
Virtual facial reconstruction based on accurate registration and fusion of 3D facial and MSCT scans.基于三维面部扫描与多层螺旋CT扫描精确配准和融合的虚拟面部重建。
J Orofac Orthop. 2016 Mar;77(2):104-11. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0014-8. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
10
A new method for automatic tracking of facial landmarks in 3D motion captured images (4D).一种用于在 3D 运动捕捉图像(4D)中自动跟踪面部地标点的新方法。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;42(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.10.035. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display.先进可视化方法的临床接受度:3D打印、虚拟现实眼镜和3D显示器的比较研究
3D Print Med. 2022 Jan 30;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41205-022-00133-z.