Schranner Daniela, Scherer Lisa, Lynch Grant P, Korder Svenja, Brotherhood John R, Pluim Babette M, Périard Julien D, Jay Ollie
1Technical University of Munich, Institute of Ergonomics, Garching, GERMANY; 2Thermal Ergonomics Laboratory, Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, AUSTRALIA; 3Medical Department, Koninklijke Nederlandse Lawn Tennis, Amersfoort, THE NETHERLANDS; and 4Athlete Health and Performance Research Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, QATAR.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 May;49(5):991-998. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001183.
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different in-play cooling strategies for mitigating heat strain during simulated tennis match-play activity in a hot/humid environment representing the most extreme conditions during the US Open (36°C, 50% relative humidity).
On three occasions, nine males completed an intermittent treadmill protocol with an exercise intensity and activity profile simulating a four-set tennis match, with 90-s breaks between odd-numbered games and 120-s breaks between sets, according to International Tennis Federation rules. During breaks, 1) the currently used cooling strategy-an ice-filled damp towel around the neck and a cold-damp towel on the head and thighs (ICE); 2) wetting of arms, neck, face, and lower legs with a sponge in front of an electric fan (FANwet); or 3) no cooling (CON) were applied. Rectal (Tre) and mean skin (Tsk) temperature and HR were measured throughout. Thermal sensation and RPE were assessed during breaks. Trials were terminated upon reaching a Tre ≥ 39.5°C or volitional exhaustion.
Seven, five, and one participant completed FANwet, ICE, and CON, respectively. By end set 1, ΔTre was lower in FANwet (0.92°C ± 0.15°C) compared with CON (1.09°C ± 0.09°C, P = 0.01), and by end set 2, ΔTre was lower (P < 0.001) in FANwet (1.55°C ± 0.23°C) and ICE (1.59°C ± 0.17°C) compared with CON (1.99°C ± 0.19°C). Mean RPE (FANwet = 13.9 ± 2.2, ICE = 13.6 ± 1.8, CON = 16.6 ± 1.8), HR (FANwet = 163 ± 21, ICE 164 ± 22, CON = 175 ± 19 bpm), Tsk (FANwet = 36.56°C ± 0.69°C, ICE 36.12°C ± 0.44°C, CON = 37.21°C ± 0.42°C), and thermal sensation were lower in FANwet and ICE (P < 0.05) compared with CON by end set 2.
The currently recommended ICE strategy successfully mitigates thermal strain during simulated tennis match play in hot/humid conditions. The FANwet intervention is an equally effective alternative that may be more practical in limited resource settings.
本研究旨在评估在美国网球公开赛最极端条件(36°C,相对湿度50%)的炎热/潮湿环境下,不同比赛中的降温策略对减轻模拟网球比赛活动期间热应激的效果。
九名男性在三种情况下完成了一项间歇性跑步机方案,其运动强度和活动模式模拟了一场四盘网球比赛,根据国际网球联合会规则,奇数局之间休息90秒,盘间休息120秒。在休息期间,1)采用当前使用的降温策略——颈部围一条装满冰块的湿毛巾,头部和大腿上敷一条冷湿毛巾(ICE);2)在电风扇前用海绵蘸湿手臂、颈部、面部和小腿(FANwet);或3)不进行降温(CON)。全程测量直肠温度(Tre)、平均皮肤温度(Tsk)和心率(HR)。在休息期间评估热感觉和主观用力程度(RPE)。当Tre≥39.5°C或自愿性疲劳时试验终止。
分别有7名、5名和1名参与者完成了FANwet、ICE和CON试验。到第一盘结束时,FANwet组的ΔTre(0.92°C±0.15°C)低于CON组(1.09°C±0.09°C,P = 0.01);到第二盘结束时,FANwet组(1.55°C±0.23°C)和ICE组(1.59°C±0.17°C)的ΔTre低于CON组(1.99°C±0.19°C,P < 0.001)。到第二盘结束时,FANwet组的平均RPE(FANwet = 13.9±2.2,ICE = 13.6±1.8,CON = 16.6±1.8)、心率(FANwet = 163±21,ICE = 164±22,CON = 175±19次/分钟)、Tsk(FANwet = 36.56°C±0.69°C,ICE = 36.12°C±0.44°C,CON = 37.21°C±0.42°C)和热感觉均低于CON组(P < 0.05)。
目前推荐的ICE策略在炎热/潮湿条件下的模拟网球比赛中能成功减轻热应激。FANwet干预是一种同样有效的替代方法,在资源有限的环境中可能更实用。