Suppr超能文献

对于阴道镜检查结果不满意的女性,采用环形电切术而非冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

El-Nashar Sherif A, Shazly Sherif A, Hopkins Matthew R, Bakkum-Gamez Jamie N, Famuyide Abimbola O

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2017 Apr;21(2):129-136. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000287.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis compared loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) with cold-knife conization (CKC) for treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in patients with unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted from inception until April 2015. We included clinical trials and cohort studies comparing CKC with LEEP for treating CIN. The primary outcome was a combined end point of persistent CIN (<6 months after conization) and recurrent CIN (>6 months). Secondary outcomes included procedural, pathologic, and long-term outcomes. Pooled relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used to report binary and continuous outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 26 studies, the incidence of persistent and recurrent disease after LEEP was comparable with that after CKC (15.6% vs 7.38%; RR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.00-1.81). Loop electrosurgical excision procedure was faster, caused less intraoperative bleeding, and resulted in shorter hospital stay (WMD, 9.5 minutes [95% CI = 6.4-12.6 minutes]; WMD, 42.4 mL [95% CI = 21.3-106 mL]; and WMD, 1.5 days [95% CI = 1.1-1.8 days], respectively). Loop electrosurgical excision procedure cones were shallower with overall less volume and weight than CKC (WMD, 5.1 mm [95% CI = 3.2-7.1 mm]; 2.6 mm [95% CI = 0.6-5.7 mm]; and 2.6 g [95% CI = 1.4-3.7 g], respectively). During follow-up, LEEP was associated with less cervical stenosis and fewer unsatisfactory examinations; however, this was not statistically significant (RR, 0.5 [95% CI = 0.1-1.5]; RR, 0.7 [95% CI = 0.4-1.2], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Loop electrosurgical excision procedure is an acceptable alternative to CKC in women with CIN and unsatisfactory colposcopic examinations. Close follow-up is necessary for prompt detection and treatment of persistent or recurrent disease.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析比较了环形电切术(LEEP)与冷刀锥切术(CKC)在阴道镜检查结果不满意的患者中治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的效果。

材料与方法

对MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane系统评价、CENTRAL、科学引文索引和Scopus数据库进行了从建库至2015年4月的文献检索。我们纳入了比较CKC与LEEP治疗CIN的临床试验和队列研究。主要结局是锥切术后持续CIN(<6个月)和复发性CIN(>6个月)的合并终点。次要结局包括手术、病理和长期结局。分别采用合并相对危险度(RR)和加权均数差(WMD)来报告二分类和连续性结局。

结果

在26项研究中,LEEP术后持续性和复发性疾病的发生率与CKC术后相当(15.6%对7.38%;RR = 1.35;95%CI = 1.00 - 1.81)。环形电切术速度更快,术中出血更少,住院时间更短(WMD分别为9.5分钟[95%CI = 6.4 - 12.6分钟];WMD为42.4 mL[95%CI = 21.3 - 106 mL];WMD为1.5天[95%CI = 1.1 - 1.8天])。环形电切术的锥切标本比CKC更浅,总体积和重量更小(WMD分别为5.1 mm[95%CI = 3.2 - 7.1 mm];2.6 mm[95%CI = 0.6 - 5.7 mm];2.6 g[95%CI = 1.4 - 3.7 g])。随访期间,LEEP导致的宫颈狭窄和不满意检查较少;然而,差异无统计学意义(RR分别为0.5[95%CI = 0.1 - 1.5];RR为0.7[95%CI = 0.4 - 1.2])。

结论

对于CIN且阴道镜检查结果不满意的女性,环形电切术是CKC的可接受替代方法。对于持续性或复发性疾病,需要密切随访以便及时发现和治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验