Macri Christophe, Dumont Claire, Panozza Scott, Lahoud Mireille H, Caminschi Irina, Villadangos Jose A, Johnston Angus P R, Mintern Justine D
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Infection and Immunity Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Mol Immunol. 2017 Jan;81:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
Targeting antigen (Ag) to dendritic cell (DC) surface receptors is a potential new mode of vaccination. C-type lectin-like receptors Clec9A and Clec12A are attractive receptor targets however their targeting in vivo elicits significantly different outcomes for unknown reasons. To gain insight into the mechanisms responsible, we have examined the intrinsic capacity of Clec9A and Clec12A to elicit MHC I and MHC II Ag presentation following ex vivo targeting with primary murine DC. Both receptors exhibited high rates of internalization by CD8 DCs, while Clec12A delivered a significantly higher Ag owing to its higher expression level. Targeting Ag to immature CD8 DCs via both Clec9A and Clec12A failed to elicit MHC I cross-presentation above that of controls, while Clec12A was the superior receptor to target following CD8 DC maturation. CD8 DCs were unable to elicit MHC I cross-presentation regardless of the receptor targeted. For MHC II presentation, targeting Ag to Clec12A enabled significant responses by both immature CD8 and CD8 DCs, whereas Clec9A did not elicit significant MHC II Ag presentation by either DC subset, resting or mature. Therefore, Clec9A and Clec12A exhibit different intrinsic capacities to elicit MHC I and MHC II presentation following direct Ag targeting, though they can only elicit MHC I responses if the DC expressing the receptor is equipped with the capacity to cross-present. Our conclusions have consequences for the exploitation of these receptors for vaccination purposes, in addition to providing insight into their roles as Ag targets in vivo.
将抗原(Ag)靶向树突状细胞(DC)表面受体是一种潜在的新型疫苗接种模式。C型凝集素样受体Clec9A和Clec12A是有吸引力的受体靶点,然而它们在体内的靶向作用却引发了显著不同的结果,原因不明。为了深入了解其背后的机制,我们检测了Clec9A和Clec12A在用原代小鼠DC进行体外靶向作用后引发MHC I和MHC II抗原呈递的内在能力。两种受体在CD8 DC中均表现出高内化率,而Clec12A由于其较高的表达水平传递了显著更多的抗原。通过Clec9A和Clec12A将抗原靶向未成熟CD8 DC均未能引发高于对照组的MHC I交叉呈递,而Clec12A是CD8 DC成熟后靶向的更优受体。无论靶向何种受体,CD8 DC均无法引发MHC I交叉呈递。对于MHC II呈递,将抗原靶向Clec12A能使未成熟CD8和CD8 DC均产生显著反应,而Clec9A无论是静止还是成熟的DC亚群均未引发显著的MHC II抗原呈递。因此,Clec9A和Clec12A在直接抗原靶向作用后引发MHC I和MHC II呈递的内在能力不同,不过只有当表达该受体的DC具备交叉呈递能力时,它们才能引发MHC I反应。我们的结论不仅有助于深入了解这些受体在体内作为抗原靶点的作用,还对利用这些受体进行疫苗接种具有重要意义。