Wong Wai Kit, Chien Wai Tong
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2017 Mar;31:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
Emergency unit is one of the most high-risk areas for patient violence. However, in Hong Kong, little research has been test psychometric properties of assessment tool of Emergency unit nurses' attitude toward violence.
The Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale's (MAVASs) Scale- and Item-Content Validity Index were established by 5-experts panel. A convenience sample of 123 nurses working in 4 public Emergency Department in Hong Kong was recruited. The construct validity was tested using exploratory factor analysis and the reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability.
The Scale-Content Validity Index was 97.0% and the Item-Content Validity Indexes ranged from 80.0% to 100.0%. Exploratory factor analysis indicated 4-factors solution (i.e., "importance of communication with patients", "perceived effectiveness of interventions", "pitfalls of interventions" and "perceived need for intervention"). Its' internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alphas=0.40-0.77) across the 4 subscales and test-retest reliability over 4-week interval was satisfactory (Pearson's coefficient=0.85).
MAVAS was found to be a valid and reliable tool to examine nurses' attitudes towards patients' violence in emergency care setting, and provides useful information to those developing training and intervention programmes for management of aggression.
急诊科是患者暴力行为的高危区域之一。然而,在香港,很少有研究测试急诊科护士对暴力态度评估工具的心理测量特性。
由5名专家组成的小组确定了攻击与暴力态度管理量表(MAVAS)的量表和项目内容效度指数。招募了在香港4家公立急诊科工作的123名护士作为便利样本。使用探索性因素分析测试结构效度,并通过克朗巴赫α系数和重测信度评估信度。
量表内容效度指数为97.0%,项目内容效度指数范围为80.0%至100.0%。探索性因素分析表明有4个因素的解决方案(即“与患者沟通的重要性”、“干预措施的感知效果”、“干预措施的缺陷”和“感知到的干预需求”)。其在4个分量表上的内部一致性令人满意(克朗巴赫α系数=0.40 - 0.77),4周间隔的重测信度也令人满意(皮尔逊系数=0.85)。
MAVAS被发现是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于检查急诊科护士对患者暴力行为的态度,并为那些制定攻击管理培训和干预计划的人提供有用信息。