Iosif C, Mounayer C, Yavuz K, Saleme S, Geyik S, Cekirge H S, Saatci I
From the Interventional Neuroradiology Department (C.I., C.M., S.S.), Dupuytren University Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Limoges), Limoges, France
From the Interventional Neuroradiology Department (C.I., C.M., S.S.), Dupuytren University Hospital (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Limoges), Limoges, France.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Feb;38(2):310-316. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5022. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
Flow diverters have been increasingly used lately in off-label, distal intracranial aneurysm treatments. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of flow diverters in the treatment of middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms and to analyze midterm angiographic patterns of regional flow modifications for safety and clinical outcomes.
Consecutive patients treated from January 2010 to December 2014 by the authors by using endovascular flow-diverting stents for MCA bifurcation aneurysms were evaluated retrospectively with prospectively maintained data. All patients had been followed for at least 12 months after treatment, with at least 2 control angiograms; regional flow-related angiographic modifications were registered by using a new angiographic outcome scale for flow diverters. Data were analyzed with emphasis on procedure-related events, angiographic results, and clinical outcome.
Fifty-eight patients were included in the study, with 63 MCA bifurcation aneurysms; 13 of these were large and giant. Pretreatment mRS was 0 for 12 patients (20.7%), 1 for 41 (70.7%), and 2 for 5 patients (8.6%). Six-month control revealed mRS 0-2 for 57 (98.3%) patients and 3 for 1 (1.7%) patient. Procedure-related morbidity and mortality were 8.6% (5/58) and 0%, respectively. From 95% of still circulating immediate postprocedure angiographic outcomes, 68% progressed to aneurysm occlusion at 6 months and 95%, to occlusion at 12 months, with a 0% aneurysm rupture rate.
Flow diverters seem to be an effective treatment alternative for complex MCA bifurcation aneurysms, with reasonable complication rates. Longer angiographic follow-ups are needed to assess the morphologic outcome; immediate subtotal occlusions do not seem to be related to rupture.
近年来,血流导向装置越来越多地被用于颅内远端动脉瘤的非适应证治疗。我们的目的是评估血流导向装置治疗大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤的有效性,并分析区域血流改变的中期血管造影模式,以确保安全性和临床疗效。
对2010年1月至2014年12月期间作者使用血管内血流导向支架治疗大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤的连续患者进行回顾性评估,数据为前瞻性收集。所有患者在治疗后至少随访12个月,至少进行2次对照血管造影;使用一种新的血流导向装置血管造影结果量表记录与区域血流相关的血管造影改变。重点分析与手术相关的事件、血管造影结果和临床疗效。
58例患者纳入本研究,共63个大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤;其中13个为大型和巨大型。治疗前改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为0分的患者有12例(20.7%),1分的41例(70.7%),2分的5例(8.6%)。6个月时的对照显示,57例(98.3%)患者的mRS为0 - 2分,1例(1.7%)患者为3分。与手术相关的发病率和死亡率分别为8.6%(5/58)和0%。在术后即刻血管造影仍有血流的患者中,95%的患者在6个月时动脉瘤闭塞率进展至68%,12个月时进展至95%,动脉瘤破裂率为0%。
血流导向装置似乎是治疗复杂大脑中动脉分叉部动脉瘤的一种有效替代方法,并发症发生率合理。需要更长时间的血管造影随访来评估形态学结果;即刻次全闭塞似乎与破裂无关。