Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Povidone-Iodine 1.25% Solution Versus Topical Antibiotics for Treatment of Bacterial Keratitis.

PURPOSE

To compare povidone-iodine 1.25% ophthalmic solution with topical antibiotics for treatment of bacterial keratitis in areas of the world where use of effective topical antibiotics may not be an option.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, investigator-masked clinical trial.

METHODS

We randomized 172 individuals with bacterial keratitis to topical treatment with povidone-iodine or antibiotics (neomycin-polymyxin B-gramicidin in the Philippines; ciprofloxacin 0.3% in India). Using survival analysis, we compared intervals from start of treatment to "presumed cure" (primary outcome measure, defined as a closed epithelial defect without associated inflammatory signs) and to "recovering" (residual epithelial defect <1 mm with only minimal inflammation).

RESULTS

Median interval to presumed cure in the Philippines was 7 days for povidone-iodine and 7 days for neomycin-polymyxin B-gramicidin (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference in median interval, -9.5 to 0.7 days) and in India was 12 days for povidone-iodine and 17 days for ciprofloxacin (95% CI, -35.2 to 3.2 days). Hazard ratio (HR) for presumed cure among those treated with povidone-iodine (vs antibiotics) was 1.46 in the Philippines (95% CI, 0.90-2.36; P = .13) and 1.70 in India (95% CI, 0.73-3.94; P = .22). Comparisons of intervals to recovering and HR for recovering also revealed no significant differences between treatment groups in either country.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no significant difference between the effect of topical povidone-iodine 1.25% and topical antibiotics commonly available in the developing world for treatment of bacterial keratitis. Povidone-iodine 1.25%, which is widely available and inexpensive, can be considered for treatment of bacterial keratitis when antibiotic treatment is not practical.